Pineapple OFC Play-by-play #6: 64% to make FL! (34:19)
Poll Stupid game -- concentrate on real poker.
No votes 0% I love Crazy Pineapple!
No votes 0% The Wizard of Pineapple -- You should do it!
No votes 0% Somebody should invent a CP table game.
I've always said that poker is one of those games that makes no sense to play for nothing, but I have put in a fair bit of time the last week under the pretenses of learning the game.
Here are the basic rules: 1.
Ante in the manner as Texas Hold 'Em.
Each player gets three hole cards.
Each player must discard one of his hole cards.
The only difference from Texas Hold 'Em is the player gets three hole cards and must discard one just before the turn is revealed.
Most of the time, it is obvious which card to toss, but not always.
Take this situation, for example: Flop: 9h, 7h, 7s Your cards: Jh, Jd, 2h Do you?
Toss the Jd and go for the flush.
Toss the 2h and have a two pair, with hopes of a full house.
If you toss the Jd, you have a 35.
If you toss the 2h, you have a 16.
If you don't hit it, at least you have a two pair.
I know this also depends on the kind of pot odds you're getting.
Where am I going with this?
Let me preface this by saying that I did a search online and can find no good strategy on Crazy Pineapple.
Give me a link if you think I'm wrong.
Seems to me some fresh ground to break and my contribution to poker has been, to be honest, very little.
I'd love to post something on which way to play is most likely to win, but what do I assume the other players do?
One site I stumbled on has how to play crazy pineapple poker ordered list of starting hands by strength, but it is based on Lazy Pineapple, where the player keeps all three cards throughout the game.
That doesn't help me at all.
Maybe what I could do is start with some kind of basic strategy and use an iterative process to keep improving on it.
However, this would be a fair bit of work.
I'm up for it and it would be a good challenge.
However, one thing I've learned about gambling writing is usually people appreciate the easy stuff, like top ten lists, and the groundbreaking obscure stuff gets ignored.
What would you do in my shoes?
In your example, and in your shoes, I would toss the Jd card for a higher chance of completing the Flush.
Only someone really gambling challenged would take the risk that has a lower chance of completing the Flush.
In both The Hunger Games and in gambling, may the odds be ever in your favor.
What is so complicated about it?
In other words, two pair has lower than normal value if it includes the community cards.
Does that make sense or does it just show my poker needs improving?
So I would want the jacks to have a chance of winning, though naturally i would want them to improve.
I usually go by the number of players in the hand.
If I think Jacks or Trips, excepting the effect of the pair of 7s, would not likely win, I'd go for the flush.
I don't know how people can quickly figure pot odds.
I'd have to ask the game to stop while I figured them, which of course goes over like a lead balloon.
Naturally I recognize a big fat pot, but that usually has treachery of its own exceeding what pot odds would how to play crazy pineapple poker you.
Seems also that it is more complicated than usually presented, since you need to know not only the chances of getting a flush etc but also the probability that such a hand can win.
Arnold Snyder I have quite a bit of hold em experience, but very limited Pineapple and Crazy Pineapple experience.
The solvers like PioSolver and others that leverage GTO into their strategies are quite effective in analyzing two card strategies against a range of hands.
But how to play crazy pineapple poker this case, the three combinations you hold would need to be analyzed against the expected range of the opponents which would naturally be stronger as they get to take the best two of three cards.
That's where I get stuck, in developing the opponents range.
In deciding which card to discard, as you mention it is usually obvious.
But some factors that need to be factored in are the absolute hand strengths, the number of opponents, your position, and the betting pattern on the flop.
In your specific example, in general I think I would keep the Jh Jd and discard the 2h.
You have an overpair to the board and thus a two pair combination which still has two streets to improve to a very nutted hand that has showdown value over someone holding a 9x.
You also don't have the click here flush draw, there are three better flush possibilities even how to play crazy pineapple poker you hit yours.
The fascinating part about this is that I may change my strategy if there are a lot of players in the hand, as that increased the chance that someone is holding a 7, thus increasing the chance that two pair is no good.
I agree with MidwestAP.
I would play the Jacks because I wouldn't be confident that my Jack high flush would be the best hand the majority of the time assuming a full table.
Completing either the Full House or the Flush leaves you with a hand that is still easily beaten.
While dealing in my pub league I often tell people, "Having two pair, when one of them is on the board, ain't that great.
Of course, if there is no flop bet, then you gotta make a discard decision.
Often as in Wiz' example it's a tough decision.
And almost as often, the turn or river proves you made the wrong choice.
Frankly, that's why it's called Crazy Pineapple.
On a side note, there's also Pineapple, where you discard before the flop.
Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown.
But how much does it cost to knock on wood?
Religion is nothing more than organized superstition.
I view that as the definitive serious poker forum on the internet.
Quote: unJon Did you check the Two plus Just click for source forum?
I view that as the definitive serious poker forum on the internet.
They didn't have much of value.
I'm currently running a program to see what the one player probabilities are in Lazy Pineapple.
That will give me a starting point.
The program takes 16 hours to complete.
I am an experienced poker player and I tend to agree with the thoughts of MidwestAP.
A pocket pair of Jacks to a 9 high board with a pair of 9s is a strong made hand and a flush draw is a speculative hand.
For me, the number of opponents in the pot and how much strength they have shown pre- and postflop is a critical issue.
Also how large my stack size is.
I am thinking "what will I do if an Ace comes out on the turn or river and my opponent bets?
So, 1 I've already won the hand or 2 I am dealing with one probably opponent who has either called 3 or raised my bet and I've called 4 or shoved and I've called If 2 I assume my opponent has a range of hands that include 2 hearts or a 9, or AK,AQ or less likely AJ.
If my opponent and I have deep stacks and an A,K, or Q comes then I have a very difficult decision to make and I may not continue on to the River no matter what I chose.
Note my two suited cards are not high.
If I keep them and discard the off-suit jack and a heart comes at the turn, I am probably folding to a raise by my opponent.
If 3 I assume a slightly stronger range.
Maybe a 7 as the click here card in the preflop hand or 2 hearts and a 9 or two overcards.
I think I favor discarding the off-suit jack, but I hate my hand.
This is either a very strong hand or a bluff assuming opponent is a good player and stack sizes would be important here.
I probably would have already folded to a post-flop all-in.
Basically, if you are playing with good players then I question how often this hand goes to a showdown.
If you are playing with bad players at low stakes and especially if more than one player is in how to play crazy pineapple poker hand postflop then I agree with your analysis.
So many better men, a few of them friends, were dead.
And a thousand thousand slimy things lived on, and so did I.
Crazy Pineapple: Variation on Texas Hold 'Em
It is an American casino game in which each individual plays against the bank. In some ways, it is similar to. Crazy Pineapple Rules for Poker.
Excuse, that I interfere, but I suggest to go another by.
Also that we would do without your excellent phrase
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are mistaken. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
What do you mean?
It is a pity, that now I can not express - it is compelled to leave. But I will be released - I will necessarily write that I think.
I think, that you are not right. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.