From poker fan boy to poker champion! Taking down the biggest EPT of all time!
Doc Wordinger lives and works in central Manchester.
He has a fondness for golf, poker, fine literature, art and film.
Who are the best poker players to have graced the green felt?
Which players have perplexed their opponents, wowed the crowds, bluffed, betted and folded with that flair of genius that only a handful of people, out of millions, attain?
From the steamboats to the saloons, from Vegas to the internet, poker has undergone a dramatic evolution.
Today, there are more players, and more professionals, than ever before.
But among the novices, tourists, mathematicians, degenerates, rounders, high-rollers, hustlers and online grinders, a tiny elite of legendary names this web page surface in the ongoing debate about the greatest poker player of all time.
He was a self-destructive but generous reprobate with a razor-sharp mind and a supernatural instinct for reading the game, and his talents extended far beyond the poker table.
He was unbeatable at gin rummy and destroyed his closest rivals with such fierce certainty that the queue of challengers dwindled to zero.
He applied his genius to blackjack, too, and won hundreds of thousands of dollars before the casinos banned him from playing.
But it was poker where he achieved immortality.
Early Years: "The Kid" The fast-talking gin prodigy settled in Las Vegas in the late 1970s and was soon a regular in the high stakes poker cash games.
Despite having limited experience, Ungar took to poker with lightning something poker straight a 2 3 4 5 this />He successfully defended his title the following year.
He became the only player to win the WSOP and Superbowl of Poker Main Events three times each.
His success spanned several variations of the game, including holdem, draw and stud.
Money won from cards was usually squandered on sports bets.
In the early eighties, he developed a cocaine addiction that would torment him for the rest of his life.
He constantly went from millionaire to bust and would often solicit loans for drugs under article source pretence of rebuilding his poker bankroll.
Death In 1997, emaciated and gaunt, his nose septum completely devoured by cocaine, Ungar begged a fellow player to lend him the £10k needed to sit in the WSOP Main Event.
He came first, crushing a field of 312 players and announcing his return as the king of the card room.
Eighteen months later, having declined to defend his title, Ungar was found dead in a low-rent Vegas motel room.
At his very best, Ungar played poker with an aggression and creativity that was years ahead of its time.
Chip Reese very nearly sidestepped poker immortality.
On his way to Stanford University to study law in 1974, he dropped by Las Vegas for the weekend for a little low stakes poker.
And so it began.
Goodbye Law School, Hello Poker.
Early Years Reese honed his card game skills as a click the following article boy under the guidance of his mother.
At college, he won so much money from his fellow students and lecturers that go here named the campus card room after him.
Settling in Vegas in the mid 1970s, he quickly built a reputation for himself as one of the best cash game players in the city.
Career Accomplishments Reese mainly shunned the tournament scene, favouring cash games which he felt where more profitable.
Despite this, he still claimed two WSOP bracelets in 1978 and 1982 before adding a third in 2006.
E event which is a tournament combining click here variations of poker.
E tournament in the world takes genius.
He became such a respected and trusted figure in the game that the Dunes casino asked him to manage their card room.
At the age of 40, he was the youngest ever inductee into the poker hall of fame.
Death Chip Reese died aged 56 in 2007.
Doyle Brunson gave him a fitting farewell.
Ivey is both a throwback to yesteryear and a thoroughly modern pro.
He goes searching for action with the same lunacy and indifference to money as Stu Ungar, Jack Strauss and the old Texas gamblers who were capable of betting on any event at any price.
At the same time, Ivey maintains a presence in online and televised poker, building the kind of reputation and public profile that is considered the hallmark of professional players in the https://bannerven.com/poker/rabbit-hunting-poker.html century.
Despite this, he rarely makes self-promotional media appearances, relying instead on an audacious playing style and sixth sense to fortify his place at the top of the poker community.
Early Years Ivey learnt the game in Atlantic City in the 1990s.
Career Accomplishments Over the course of the next decade,becoming the youngest and quickest player ever to reach that figure.
Victories in the Monte Carlo Millions and World Poker Tour boosted his bankroll further.
His expertise pervades through all formats of poker—a rare talent!
A syndicate of players combined their bankrolls and took it in turns to play Beal.
A demoralised Beal ended the challenge shortly after.
Johnny Moss is perhaps best known for his role in establishing the WSOP as the biggest poker extravaganza in the world.
Early Years Born in 1907, Moss was an old-school Texas road gambler who dodged bullets and lawmen in search of action in the Deep South.
The match was said to have lasted for five months.
Career Accomplishments The inaugural event of the WSOP in 1970 was contested by six of the most prominent names in the game and the winner decided by ballot.
Moss received the backing of his peers and became the first ever poker world champion.
In 1971, when the WSOP reverted to a winner-takes-all tournament format, he won again.
In all, Moss won a total of nine first-place bracelets and was the most successful WSOP player of the 1970s.
Death Johnny Moss continued playing poker tournaments right up until his death in 1995 at the age of 88.
Doyle Brunson has been called The Godfather of Poker.
He is the elder statesman of the poker world, a father figure to the game who has witnessed firsthand the staggering transformation that poker has undergone in the last sixty years.
Now in his late seventies, Doyle remains competitive in the biggest cash games and tournaments in Las Vegas.
Behind the grandfatherly and genial demeanor lies the battle-hardened soul of a man who first made a living from poker when it was necessary to carry a gun as protection.
After briefly flirting with a job as a salesman, Doyle found that he could make far more money playing cards and turned to poker for a full-time income.
He teamed up with other rounders, including Amarillo Slim, and they pooled their resources and toured Texas looking for action.
Many of the games in those days were organized by crime syndicates.
Brunson was the victim of several robberies and assaults during those days on the road and even claimed to have once seen a player shot dead.
Career Accomplishments In the early 1970s, he moved to Vegas and became a fixture in the newly formed World Series of Poker.
He would go on to win ten first place bracelets over the next thirty five years, currently lying in second place on the all-time list, one behind Phil Helmuth.
Alongside his WSOP success, he has also added a World Poker Tour title to his trophy cabinet at the 2004 Legends of Poker.
Like Chip Reese, Brunson has played a prominent role in the biggest cash games in Las Vegas for over three decades.
Despite his advancing years, Doyle even became skilled at internet poker without quite matching his betting stakes in the real world and also has a large following of devoted poker fans on Twitter.
The book was one of the first poker instructional guides, and in it Brunson shared his poker philosophy, endorsing an aggressive style of play.
He has kept himself at the forefront of every major develop in poker since he arrived in Vegas in 1970, adapting his game and persona to each new passing generation.
He is a poker legend in the truest sense Who is YOUR Number One?
With all the different variations and formats of the game, and so many playing styles, any article featuring the top five best poker players of all time is bound to be highly subjective and maybe a little controversial.
Do you agree with the list above?
Perhaps your own list would be made up of five entirely different players?
Or possibly you concur with my selection but disagree with the order?
learn more here free to vote in the poll below or leave a comment.
No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked.
Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.
Crandall Attignton was one of the best players and no limit holdem pioneer.
To this day still holds the most final table record.
Doyle inducted him to world poker hall of fame.
This is a "cash game" list, not a tournament list which as you know would be quite different.
Chip Reese won the most money in the super high limit games they played in.
He was considered by most of his peers as the best all-around player.
His partner Danny Robison was a great 7 card stud player, that like Stuey also had his demons.
If you rated the top 6 players Reese,Ungar,Moss,Brunson, Chan and Roger Moore would be the the 6 best.
His style is amazing.
He'll go all in more times grosvenor casino poker schedule bolton everyone else at his tables.
I agree with Stu and Doyle and Reese being on the list but to omit Phil hellmuth is just bias.
Anyone who has as many bracelets as he does just shows how great a player he is.
He is constantly making the money and alot of final tables.
Stu Unger, if not for his addiction he would still be a dominate click here in the poker world.
Fearless with sovont skills.
He is so underestimated … In my opinion he's the greatest poker player alive … only surpassed by Stu.
Cloutier have zero votes?
My Favourite is Stu Ungar.
Best tournament players, maybe.
I am fan of Phil Ivey and I follow him.
I am very happy too see him in this best players of all time list.
I rarely lose any battles on the felt, the only man I would fear at my table is Ungar.
In the poker world.
I especially liked the last paragraph with an exception.
I would have loved to see Stu play minus the cocaine against Daniel.
As was said about Ungar in 1997, the same can be said for Negreanu now.
They both are the closest thing to a clairvoyant playing poker knowing what their opponents hole cards are as have ever been.
I do concede that Daniel does not listen to that inner voice as much as he Stu did.
That is a heads up match wish could have happened.
Doyle won female poker stars british WPT the height of the poker and Boom and also his Tenth Bracelet.
Chip Reese won the players Championship also.
Phill Ivey Beat Slim for his First Bracelet.
Also Doyle just placed in the top 400 in the main event.
So the older Generation can compete in Tournaments with Younger Generation As far as Cash Games I beleive these old timers would Slaughter these young Kids.
Doyle set record on HSP with 18 straight wins on that show.
Also the time of his death Chip was considered by young and old alike as the Best Cash Game Player in the world.
I also believe if Stu Ungar had quit coke he would be the bracelet leader ahead of Helmuth.
Lets Face Stu only played in 14 Main events and won 3.
Would have won 4 if not for overdose in 1990.
Still click final with out even showing up for last Day INCREDIBLE!!!
He would of Crushed WPT especially early on.
As for Johhny Moss he was winng Bracelets into his Late Seventies early eighties years of age.
This list is absolutely correct.
As I've mentioned in some of the earlier comments, I certainly consider Negreanu one of the best players of his generation.
I do miss Tom Dwan and dearly love Doyle Brunson.
I think he's fantastic.
Also, poker tour crown casino apl year for Ivey online but he's still a great player.
Daniel Colman is someone to watch for in the next several years.
You've both mentioned some good players in your comments.
Johnny Chan definitely featured on my shortlist when I was originally writing this article.
The game is vastly different now than it was in the '80s and '90s and I wonder how Ungar would have adapted to the changes.
You make an excellent point.
Ultimately, comparing players from different generations is a futile and impossible exercise it is fun and entertaining though.
I certainly think that it's easy to overrate players from earlier generations because of nostalgia and myth.
I think modern poker players have a much greater advantage in learning the game than yesterday's players because of internet poker and the boom in poker literature.
Many of today's stars are playing sophisticated moves because they read about them in books then perfected them through thousands of online hands.
In the 1970s, players made these moves instinctively.
I can't remember the exact quote but I think Negreanu once said something about previous generations knowing HOW to play great poker but not WHY this web page was great poker.
Today, players know the HOW and the WHY.
And by "greatest" I mean most likely to win a tournament or make money in a cash game if you made these top players go against each other.
Stu Ungar, Chip Reese, Johnny Moss, and Doyle Brunson were some of the greatest players of their generation and revolutionized the game.
But the game has evolved beyond them, and more effective poker strategies have been developed.
Modern players have more advanced game fundamentals and a better understanding of poker game theory.
Other than Phil Ivey, who is one of these modern pros, none of the players on this list could out-compete a modern professional.
If you look at the WSOP and WPT circuits, high stakes cash games and successful online players, it is completely dominated by the new generation of players.
None of the old pros from the 60s, 70s and 80s have been competitive in modern tournaments or online.
Even top pros from the 90s and early 2000s are not as successful as players from the last 10 years.
Most of their books on poker and their theories about the game are now considered outdated.
The only older professionals who have been successful are the ones who have adopted modern poker strategies.
Again, I appreciate the effort put forth into making this list, but a more appropriate list would be to name the top poker players of their respective generations.
Modern players are simply better.
I agree with your list 100% but I'd like to see you do a list of of the best recent poker players in recent times, now that would be a champs christchurch poker tougher list!
I like Daniel Negreanu too!
I hate to leave Hubs but for no reason Google cut me off and won't answer my emails.
I researched and found that it is a robot that is making their decisions.
I am going back to ezine articles because I can use Chiitika which does the same thing as google.
And I can also get my articles picked up on other blogs.
Note: My rating of Negreanu is he is one of the best in the world.
Only 2 to 4 percent actually make money over the long run and he is one of them.
Gus Hansen has improved from being a constant loser the a tight player and winning money.
My rating him was where he compared to the top five.
The same goes for Gus Hansen.
I'd have Negreanu up a bit higher though, and what about the great Dane, Gu Hanson.
I find that consistently playing only good hands has some powerful positive advantages.
This includes big pocket pairs where you want one to four callers max.
If you have a solid table image, the good players get out of your way and you always get one or two players who call with any suited or connected or any pair.
Staying solid always puts the odds in your favor when you get into a hand.
I want to always know who I want in on the pot and who I want out.
Making a raise and getting five to eight callers out of ten is to play poker skill losing game.
I new a man who only played AA, KK, AK and AQ suited.
He never played anything else.
He always got enough callers that he always made money.
When you mix up your play the good players know what you are doing and the rest don't remember.
Most players are calling flops because of what they have in their hand and play it the way they do without considering what you have.
And making a show can cost more than a player can ever recover.
If you want more callers that will reduce the odds of you winning, than show bad cards.
You will always get more callers.
I win 90 percent of the hands I play to the river.
I have watched Daniel Negreanu call the flop seven and eight times per round several different times at different tables.
He may have had an exceptional run of good cards but they don't keep happening time after time.
I don't know if you still can but if you can watch him play on the Poker Stars real money website.
The hand 10-2 is a reasonable call heads up.
Against one player the odds are slightly in favor of that hand.
I don't believe that it is an all-in hand.
Doyle said recently that he was going to stop playing that hand because he lost too much money playing it.
Of course I have been in forced play situation that forced me to take bigger risks.
I studied a lot watching every limit both at casinos and online.
The odds work exactly the same at every limit.
The cards come out just the same.
The only difference is the amount of money risked.
The only real difference is the number of callers that call at different limits.
In a low limit game, you will often get five to eihgt caller per flop.
All of the players are live ones.
You can't beat the mob.
I wrote an ebook on the subject of playing low limit holdem.
You can take a look at it by clicking here.
You are welcome to rant here any time you please.
I think you are a little harsh on Negreanu.
He actually made his name in poker pre-internet boom and ground out a living playing 10-20 limit before his first big year in '97.
He plays junk starting hands to mix up his game and avoid becoming predictable.
If you only play conventional starting hands from zynga poker downtime chart then sooner or later, good players will notice this and start to exploit you.
Negreanu is no different to many of the other top players in that they do play junk from time to time.
But they do it sparingly, and tend to make a big deal out of it so that you remember.
Like you say, Negreanu is very likeable.
My only real gripe with him is that he seems to focus much more on his non-playing business ventures these days see Full Contact and Poker VT etc.
In contrast, Phil Ivey doesn't even appear to maintain or update his own website.
He just plays, obsessively.
I'd like to come back on a point about Doyle.
A agree that we often see a lot of situations in the modern game where it seems players are willing to call with almost any two cards.
I'm always reminded of the hand where Gus Hansen calls Antonio Esfandiari's all-in with 10d-8d in the WPT a few years ago there might be better, more recent examples but I don't tend to watch poker on TV that often anymore.
I'm not really inclined to say that it 'was a dumb call' or a 'genius call' because a those guys play at a level way beyond mine, and b it happened on an edited TV show where we don't know the table history, texture or prior hands.
What I can say with 100% certainty is this: If I called all-ins with 10d-8d in my home cash game, I'd be constantly broke.
Different levels, different game.
He can tighten up and do some real damage though.
I don't want to judge a man who has earned the kind of money he has consistanty won over the years.
He seems, however, to have given in to the New Poker theory poker review playground club you can play against the odds and come out ahead in the long run.
I saw him play A-5 off suit and fill in the three space gap a few years ago.
Sometimes plain luck does win the money.
Great plays with hands like 10-2, 8-3 and more hands like these have won the World Series Of Poker more than once.
I hate to say it but dumb luck has provided a lot of money for several so called great players.
Calling heads up with every two cards seems to be the modern stratigy.
Hand choice seems to be, "I have two cards," call.
Now it is who ever gets lucky.
I think I am in a bad mood.
I have said enough.
Back to the great player on Zynga, Facebook.
I win almost 8 million a day.
Ok I will be back at a casino in three weeks.
I may see you at Spirit Mountian.
Thanks for letting me rant.
I am avoiding raving.
David hit post now.
I also have played almost daily for 18 out of the last 28 years.
I have consistently made money every year that I have played.
This is not to brag but to back my statements here.
I have learned that you can not come out ahead if you play hands that are against the odds.
And you can not talk to get information against good players.
The good players will start reading you like an open book.
Daniel Negreanu does both.
I hate to say it but he reminds me of the rich kids who got amazingly lucky and won a big tournament and now he is believed to be a great player.
I know of at least 100 players who would clean out his buy-in glasgow tuesday and over again.
They just don't have the huge sums of money it takes to play at what is considered pro level now days.
They all have earned substantial livings for many years, however.
He is very like able but if he had to earn a living playing with limited money he would not make it.
I can't even rate him in the top 10.
I am no great player but I can usually know everything he is doing.
He puts out his 9-10 suited one way and big pocket pairs another way.
By the way, 9-10 suited or not has negative expectations against more than one player.
They will always cost more in the long run than they will ever win.
You can not beat the law of probabilities ever over time.
I understan that the New Poker poker players beleive that they are so good that they can.
I love to take their money.
Here is a link to a free hand strength chart.
I'd only put Ivey in my top 5 all-time list but Negreanu wouldn't be far from my top 10.
There were some tough players among those southern road gamblers - Puggy Pearson, Amarillo Slim, Sailor Roberts - and Doyle has outlived and magic man poker something all.
These may be the top five all time.
However, Doyle has started making some high risk plays that he would have never made in the past.
I do believe that he has earned the right.
He was one of the original holdem players that brought the game of holdem from Texas to Vegas.
This youngest poker players more the reason that he is called the Godfather of poker.
I also played against him several times.
Before people say that he should not be called the Godfather of poker they should sit in a game with him.
I have been playing in casinos for almost 28 years.
There are very few players that could sit down at the table with these players and not walk away a loser time after time.
I wrote a book based partly on watching Doyle play.
Probably, once the drugs took over and he stopped washing Aggressive: Definitely Ahead of his time?
By a decade, at least Thanks for your comment Crisscross76.
I agree with everything you said although the 'Jew' comment was pointless circle poker swiss borderline racist.
Still, you made some good points so I'll let the comment stand.
Ahead of his time.
Despite being, well an arrogant, stinky, disrespectful Jew, he was the best.
Hands down he was so aggressive and dead on with his reads that he can not be touched even today.
I put a lot of time into thinking about this Top 5 list and just couldn't find a way to rank Doyle above any of the four other legends.
Brunson is 'Mr Poker' but I do think there have been better players.
Poker goes back way too far for Doyle to be continue reading the father of the game.
But you could possibly argue that he is the father of the modern game.
He is certainly the most famous player of the last 40 years.
Like you said, can be applied to anything.
Good idea on the hub stuff, I will follow you and keep an eye on what you write about, could maybe help each other out.
I think Doyle deserves to be in any top five list based on his achievements over the last fifty years.
He's in his 70s now so there is little chance that he can consistently compete with the new generation.
When you get old, your brain starts to slow down and your body begins to fail.
That's why masters of both physical and mental games lose their edge as the years roll by.
Throughout his career, Doyle has displayed a natural instinct for poker, far exceeding that of the average grinder pro, and his aggressive approach to the game is a style that has been mimicked by all of today's stars.
I don't really watch HSP anymore so I don't know the hand you are referring to but I understand your point.
Times change and usually the older players get left behind.
Fifty years from now, an aging Tom Dwan will make an ultra-aggressive flop bluff in a high stakes TV game the kind of play that makes him millions of dollars today and find that he can no longer push opponents off TPTK or AA etc.
As I said, the game evolves and the older players get left behind.
I see you've written a hub on online poker.
If you want some more ideas, why not write a hub about the best players of the 21st century, the most underrated players in the world today or your favorite hands plus analysis from HSP.
I think there is scope for a ton of poker articles on Hubpages.
He bleeds money every time he plays cash, well at least when its televised.
Too much of a gambler, he doesn't really play with logic, more with his set routines.
I check called flop with a backdoor, turned a combo draw, so I will check shove vs any bet.
Well, that's not always correct, you have to take into account their possible double barrelling range on a drawy turn card like that when they know a check raise is likely, as well as fold equity.
Anyway, random example that was, but he just doesn't have an edge on anyone these days.
All he's got on his side is that he's not scared of the money.
Remember his triple barrel vs Lex on last seasons HSP?
Lex called him down with bottom pair no kicker, which was sick, but there's no way in hell Doyle was pot'ing a straight on the river so quickly.
Good hub though, I might write one on poker.
I think if Ivey carries on like this, he'll be the undisputed all time number one within a decade.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages ® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers authors may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
To provide a better website experience, hobbylark.
Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
Login This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Akismet This is used to detect comment spam.
HubPages Google Analytics This is used to provide this web page on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized.
HubPages Traffic Pixel This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site.
Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service.
Features Google Custom Search This is feature allows you to search the site.
Google Maps Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them.
Google Charts This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center.
Google AdSense Host API This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles.
No data is shared unless you engage with this feature.
Google YouTube Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them.
Vimeo Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them.
south point poker room number This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal.
No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature.
Facebook Login You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account.
No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature.
Maven This supports the Maven widget and search functionality.
Marketing Google AdSense This is an ad network.
Google DoubleClick Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network.
Index Exchange This is an ad network.
Sovrn This is an ad network.
Facebook Ads This is an ad network.
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace This is an ad network.
AppNexus This is an ad network.
Openx This is an ad network.
Rubicon Project This is an ad network.
TripleLift This is an ad network.
Say Media We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites.
Remarketing Pixels We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook youngest poker players order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics Author Google Analytics This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors https://bannerven.com/poker/gavin-poker-player.html articles on the HubPages Service.
Comscore ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and poker olg draw to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers.
Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data.
Amazon Tracking Pixel Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products Clicksco This is a data management platform studying reader behavior.
Top 5 Richest Poker Players in The World
... at the World Series of Poker event in Las Vegas. The 21 year old had been vying to become the first British person and youngest player to.
I recommend to you to look in google.com
Such is a life. There's nothing to be done.
This amusing opinion
Willingly I accept. An interesting theme, I will take part. I know, that together we can come to a right answer.
What phrase... super, excellent idea
You are mistaken. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
I suggest you to come on a site on which there is a lot of information on this question.
I consider, that you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM.
In it something is also idea excellent, agree with you.
I believe, that always there is a possibility.
You are not right. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.
I congratulate, you were visited with an excellent idea
It is simply matchless phrase ;)
I consider, that you are not right. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
You are not right. I am assured. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
It is a pity, that now I can not express - it is compelled to leave. But I will be released - I will necessarily write that I think on this question.
Will manage somehow.
It is already far not exception
I confirm. I join told all above. Let's discuss this question. Here or in PM.
In my opinion you are not right. I am assured. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.
There is a site on a question interesting you.
What entertaining message
It is interesting. You will not prompt to me, where to me to learn more about it?
I can suggest to visit to you a site, with a large quantity of articles on a theme interesting you.
It agree, it is an amusing piece
I recommend to you to visit a site, with an information large quantity on a theme interesting you.
The message is removed