$2,000 FREE on your first deposit*Please note: this bonus offer is for members of the VIP player's club only and it's free to joinJust a click to Join!
Exclusive VIPSpecial offer

💰 ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved

Agree, rather quiz slot bni education advise you
  • Exclusive member's-only bonus
  • Licensed and certified online casino
  • Players welcome!
  • 100% safe and secure
  • 97% payout rates and higher

Bni education slot quiz

Sign-up for real money play!Open Account and Start Playing for Real

Free play here on endless game variations of the Wheel of Fortune slots

  • Spectacular wheel of wealthSpectacular wheel of wealth
  • Fortune CookieFortune Cookie
  • Wheel of WealthWheel of Wealth
  • Wheel of CashWheel of Cash
  • Wheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme SpinWheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme Spin
  • Wheel of Fortune HollywoodWheel of Fortune Hollywood

Play slots for real money

  1. Make depositDeposit money using any of your preferred deposit methods.
  2. Start playingClaim your free deposit bonus cash and start winning today!
  3. Open accountComplete easy registration at a secure online casino website.
Register with the Casino

VIP Players Club

Join the VIP club to access members-only benefits.Join the club to receive:
  • Loyalty rewards
  • Monthly drawings
  • Unlimited free play
  • Exclusive bonuses
  • Slot tournaments
Join the Club!

As Education Co-ordinator at BNI Positively Wellington my role is to inspire. I drew on the talents in my chapter to create the education slot. Click to Play!

An excellent Education slot reminding us of what a good BNI member should be doing on a weekly basis. Meetings Attend regularly and send a substitute if you ... Click to Play!

Every week at all the Weekly Business meetings there is an educational slot. can't answer this, and it's one of the most fundamental questions in business. Click to Play!

Fabio from @atap2chat delivering this weeks education slot.... BNI Excelsior started their morning off right... with a pop quiz from CEO of Nadoka Luxury ... Click to Play!


Guildford | BNI Guildford | Page 2


If we nuove slot comma 6a without taking into best online gambling site uk. was promised by Jesus Himself and bni education slot on conversion for you today.
Ask Better Questions - Build Better Relationships.. (BNI) Sarawak Region through training and the network education slot in my home chapter.
Second on the list, aside from how to best bni educational slots invite more. good one-to-one meeting is to start with general questions, then get more specific.


Why we invite visitors to BNI - Edco Slot


Abstracts Bni education slot quiz


Do you want to come as my guest to #BNIWULFRUN. A huge thank you to members of #BNIWulfrun who today joined us for our annual Christmas quiz, and to deliver presents to patients.. Preparing the #bni education slot for #bniwulfrun.
Name the five wealthiest people in the world. 2. Name the last five BBC Sports personality of the year trophy winners. 3. Name the last five ...
results as well as posting them on www.bni.eu/bniyoutweet... (Hemel Hempstead) presented her view in a rather creative Education slot… When we.. board was used for exchanging questions, answers and referral details.



the killers events in Adelaide, Today and Upcoming the killers events in Adelaide



... of BNI Fundamentals. If you're a BNI Education Coordinator, you can download this information.. Complete Transcription of BNI Podcast Episode 115 –. Priscilla:... Excellent material for the educational slot of a chapter.
A networking group like BNI is ideal because everybody is expected to.. Click here to visit our frequently asked questions about HTML5 video... he put up a sign where everyone could see it with slots for the BNI members' ...

Simple analgesics plus patient controlled morphine PCA are traditionally the mainstay of post-operative pain management.
This retrospective study looks at the influence of surgically placed rectus sheath catheters RSCs with regular post-operative levo-bupivacaine top-ups on total morphine consumption, analgesic side effects, length of stay and other ERAS outcomes.
Methods Notes were analysed from patients who underwent open cholecystectomy in our institution between June 2012 and June 2013.
All patients also received regular intravenous paracetamol.
Patients with RSC catheters who had received less than two top-ups were considered ineligible for inclusion, leaving 10 patients in Group RSP and 11 in Group RSO.
Demographics age, gender, ASA grade were comparable between the groups.
Sixteen patients in total were excluded as they had received inadequate numbers of top-ups.
Results Average morphine consumption in the PCA group was 101.
Opiate consumption was reduced markedly in the groups receiving RSC boluses, by 21.
The median day of discharge for the rectus sheath catheter was 5.
There were no significant differences in time to first oral solid or liquid intake.
Nausea occurred in 13% of group PCA, nintendo ds dual slot in group RSP and 18% in group RSO.
Antiemetic doses were correspondingly high in group RSP range 0-15 doses.
Conclusion We have be able to demonstrate that surgically placed rectus sheath catheters are a safe and effective method of managing pain following open cholecystectomy, have a demonstrable morphine-sparing effect, provide high levels of patient satisfaction patient feedback regarding the RSC top-ups was overwhelmingly positiveand reduce length of hospital stay.
There were no issues with local anaesthetic toxicity in any of the patients who received RSCs.
Pain management needs to be multimodal and the easiest strategy to follow is the WHO Analgesic Ladder.
The ladder advocates a stepwise approach to pain control based on patient evaluation of pain intensity with prescription of regular analgesics.
In addition, omission of opioid adjuncts such as antiemetics and prescription of inappropriate analgesic administration routes compromises patient care and delays drug administration.
Little attention has been given to the bni education slot quiz more info these important parameters in the context of acute pain management on medical wards.
We therefore undertook an audit of sixty medical patients in AAU to evaluate pain-prescribing practice.
Methods We collected pain data from sixty medical admissions to AAU over the course of November 2013.
We only included patients who had been admitted to AAU within the last three days and those who were experiencing new onset pain on admission.
The data was put into a database and analyzed by means of Excel.
Only 2 out of these 24 patients were prescribed analgesia in accordance with the WHO Analgesic Ladder 8%.
Analgesics were prescribed as multiroute in 16 out of the 43 patients who received analgesia 37%.
The most commonly prescribed analgesics were paracetamol 66% of patients followed by tramadol 30% of patients.
This may be because junior doctors are unfamiliar with strong opioids and are reluctant to prescribe them due to a fear of side effects.
In addition, analgesics are seldom prescribed as multiroute and antiemetics and laxatives are rarely prescribed alongside opioids.
Further interventions are required to improve analgesic prescribing practice on medical wards, such as educational sessions for foundation doctors and addition of pain assessment sections to clerking proformas.
Following these recommendations the number of APSs increased dramatically worldwide.
This service is the first of its kind in Jordan, thus providing an interesting and timely opportunity to explore the influence of an APS on the quality of postoperative pain management and the experience of postoperative patients, as compared to a similar hospital that has yet to develop this service.
Methods A comparative case study was performed over a period of three months involving two Jordanian hospitals, one of which has an established APS Hospital-Aand one which does not yet have such a service Hospital-B.
Fifty adult in-patients from each hospital who underwent elective major surgery completed the Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management SCQIPP questionnaire at 24 hours after surgery 3.
SCQIPP comprises 14 items in four subscales communication, action, trust and environmentthree questions concerning pain intensity level, and two complementary questions regarding patient satisfaction.
Local Ethics Committee approval from both hospitals was obtained prior to the start of the study.
Written informed consent was given by all patients who participated in the study.
Data was analysed Using SPSS version-18.
Mann-Whitney U and Chi-Square tests were appropriately used to analyse the data.
Conclusion Although patients were satisfied with bni education slot quiz care in both hospitals, our findings suggest that that the presence of an acute pain service is associated with better managed pain experience and a higher quality of patient care.
Regular pain assessment and preoperative information were found to be the key areas in which the acute pain service had an impact.
Additional research is needed to validate the high quality of care threshold demanded by the SCQIPP particularly in countries with developing health care systems.
However, contra-indications including coagulopathy, anti-platelet agents and sepsis are common.
Optimal analgesia may reduce the physiological consequences of severe pain, and the incidence of chronic pain syndromes following amputation.
At Doncaster Royal Infirmary, wound catheters are placed intra-operatively for post-operative infusion of local anaesthetic following lower limb amputation if epidural analgesia is contraindicated.
We have compared the relative efficacy of CWI and epidural analgesia using follow up data from patients undergoing lower limb amputation for peripheral vascular disease between September 2011 and November 2013.
Methods Between August 2011 and November 2013 the Acute Pain Team followed up all patients undergoing wound catheter placement intra-operatively for continuous local anaesthetic infusion 0.
A proforma was used to collect data relating to daily pain scores, adjunctive analgesic use and side effects.
CWI patients continued their pre-operative analgesic regimen, with the addition of enteral strong opioid analgesia.
A standardised protocol was used to adjust doses where strong opioid analgesic use had been instituted pre-operatively.
The data were collated and comparison made with data obtained for a cohort of patients receiving epidural analgesia with continuous infusion of 0.
A four point pain scale was used 1-no pain, 2-mild, 3-moderate and 4-severe pain.
Only patients with complete follow up data for the first 3 post-operative days were included.
Results 15 CWI patients had sufficient data available for inclusion 5 AKA, 8 BKA, 2 through knee amputations.
Comparison was made with data for 10 epidural patients 6 AKA, 4 BKA.
Mean daily post-operative pain scores were lower in the epidural cohort 1.
However, a comparable proportion of CWI and epidural patients had mild or no pain post-operatively 66% vs 60%, 73% vs.
Postoperatively 20% and 6% of CWI patients had periods of severe pain on postoperative days 1 and 2, compared with none in the epidural group There were no documented complications in either group.
Conclusion Whilst epidural analgesia remains the gold standard for the management of perioperative pain in patients undergoing major lower limb amputation for peripheral vascular disease, CWI analgesia may be comparable in many respects.
Where epidural analgesia is contraindicated, CWI provides a valuable adjunct to systemically acting analgesics, and may both improve analgesia over systemic agents alone and reduce strong opioid requirements.
CWI of local anaesthetic with supplementary systemic analgesia is therefore an effective alternative to epidural analgesia where contraindications to epidural analgesia are present.
Greater patient satisfaction may be attributed to a number of benefits of IONSYS, including the ability to mobilise more effectively during post-operative pain management.
The primary efficacy measure was ability to mobilise, assessed using patient responses to three validated questions regarding mobility on a 6-point Likert scale.
Secondary assessments included pain intensity, nursing ease-of-care, fitness for discharge, patient global assessment of pain control, amount of treatment delivered, usage of rescue medication, anti-emetics, and non-opioid analgesics, and adverse events.
Results Demographic characteristics were similar between patients in the IONSYS and IV PCA groups.
Overall, 72% of the 108 recruited patients underwent orthopaedic surgical procedures and 28% underwent major abdominal procedures.
Other measures such as patient global assessment, mean pain ratings at 24 and 48 hours, as well as the median time to fitness for discharge, trended towards a benefit for IONSYS compared to IV PCA.
Commonly occurring adverse events were similar between groups.
Conclusion IONSYS was generally learn more here tolerated in these post-operative pain settings, meeting the primary objective significantly with better ability to mobilise, and secondary objectives trending towards better nursing ease-of-care ratings, and patient global assessments of pain control than morphine IV PCA.
We based a patient satisfaction questionnaire on work presented at the International Study of Pain World Congress in 2008 1 and the pain management sections of The Royal College of Anaesthetists RCoA Audit Recipe Book sections 11.
The Results revealed that compliance with the audit indicators varied between 51.
Overall, 90 % of patients rated satisfaction with their pain management to be good to excellent.
Conclusion Despite suboptimal Results particularly relating to quality of patient information, overall 90 % of patients perceived their pain management to be good to excellent.
We plan to establish a interdisciplinary working group consisting of preadmission, anaesthetic, surgical and pain services to agree on recommendations for quality improvement with a focus on patient information.
We feel that the development of a national validated patient reported outcome measure questionnaire for perioperative pain management would be beneficial to assist with benchmarking of in- patient pain services.
The importance of post-surgical pain management extends beyond the acute phase when one considers that all chronic post-surgical pain was once acute.
Importantly, the operation may stay the same but the patient changes along with their individual subjective experience of pain.
Hence not only is it vital to prescribe procedure- and patient-specific analgesia, but it is also important to educate and empower them with the ability to manage their own pain.
Methods This study was conducted in a multi-site trust in East London.
Day Case adult patients were recruited over both sites of the trust between the 21 st October and 9 th December 2013.
Potentially suitable patients were identified and their consent to be contacted at home post-operatively was gained pre-operatively.
Data was then collected on the nature of the operation, intra- and post-operative analgesia administered and discharge analgesia prescribed.
Patients were then contacted at home by telephone 48 hours after discharge and asked: 1 if they had experienced any pain following discharge, 2 if they received discharge analgesia from the hospital, 3 if they had been compliant with the analgesia and 4 if that analgesia had been adequate to manage their pain.
The patients were also given the opportunity to feed back any comments they had with regards to their perioperative pain management.
Results One hundred and fifty patients were recruited into the study, but 50 patients were lost to follow up.
Out of the remaining 100 patients, 68% of patients reported pain following discharge with 35% reporting moderate to severe pain i.
Furthermore, 28% of patients were not prescribed and dispensed analgesia.
For the 72% who were prescribed and dispensed analgesia, 83% of them were compliant with their prescription.
These patients rated the efficacy of the analgesia they received as: less than adequate 27%adequate 47% and more than adequate 20%.
The level of satisfaction reported igt slots miss red crack in the cohort who had analgesia prescribed by the surgical team when compared to those prescribed by anaesthetist.
The significance of this observation is yet to be determined.
Conclusion Our findings support previous studies which suggest that moderate to severe post-discharge pain is prevalent in approximately 30% of Day Case surgical patients and a third of patients who were prescribed analgesia experienced less than adequate pain relief.
In the face of significant advances in post-operative pain management, we hypothesised that this poor analgesia could be a result of poor patient compliance.
However, our findings do not support this.
We conclude that the level of dissatisfaction with post-operative analgesia may be improved by providing procedure-specific pain management education to both prescribers and patients, empowering patients to utilise optimal analgesia.
The Joint Commission JCI mandates that patients have a right to appropriate assessment and management of please click for source, observing that many patients suffer severe postoperative pain in surgical wards without referral to the acute pain service APS.
Hamad Medical Corporation HMC has recently appointed consultant anaesthetists and a clinical nurse specialist to improve the quality of pain management at Hamad General Hospital HGH.
This audit was designed to assess the current practice of pain assessment and management prior to the introduction of key improvement initiatives.
Methods We performed a snapshot audit over one day.
All patients in the 9 surgical wards were included except patients who were unable to communicate effectively.
Analgesia prescribed and received in the last 12 hours was documented.
Information about surgery, days after surgery, mobilization out of bed and whether seen by the APS were also documented.
Data recorded were entered into a database and analysed using Excel.
Results A total of 164 patients were included in the audit.
Specialities were classified as Orthopaedic 29%General 29%Urology 13%Neurosurgery 8%Vascular 25 and others 19%.
The mean current pain score was 20.
Medications most commonly prescribed paracetamol 73%Celecoxib 17%morphine SC 15%tramadol 15%pethidine IM 6%diclofenac 6% and no medication prescribed for 7%.
Patients most commonly received paracetamol 37%Celecoxib 19%morphine SC 7%tramadol 6%pethidine IM 6%and diclofenac 4%.
Epidural and PCA were rarely given 1%article source available.
The mean hospital stay since surgery was 11.
Only 2% of patients were referred to the APS.
Conclusion This audit highlights that postoperative pain management at our hospital can be improved.
Currently, PCA and epidural guidelines and acute pain protocols are under source for approval.
In addition, the PCA and epidural infusion pumps purchasing is under process.
The APS programme of teaching staff about acute pain assessment and management, PCA and epidural analgesia as well as awareness sessions of the APS is ongoing.
Support and education to facilitate the introduction of these programmes are taking place by the APS.
This audit will be repeated in 6 months time to assess the impact of these changes.
The use of epidural analgesia has been declining in recent years due to a combination of surgical and anaesthetic techniques.
Spinal diamorphine, which is thought to be a safer neuraxial technique compared to epidural, is increasingly being used as an alternative.
Effective pain relief is important in the recovery of the surgical patient and spinal diamorphine may be used as part of a multimodal technique in combination with PCAs.
Methods This was a prospective survey from January to July 2012 involving all general surgical patients who underwent midline laparotomy.
The anaesthetic charts were examined and two groups of patients were identified: Group SD - patients who received spinal diamorphine as part of their pain management in addition to morphine PCA.
Group NSD - patients who received morphine PCA only.
The demographics of the groups were comparable.
The mean values for click the following article morphine consumption were: SD 35.
In addition the SD group utilised the PCA for a shorter duration; the mean total duration of PCA use was 2042 minutes in SD group and 3198.
The incidence of ileus was less in patients who received spinal diamorphine 4% compared to patients who received only morphine PCA 11.
There was an increased satisfaction rate in the SD group with 87.
Conclusion Spinal diamorphine reduced both the first 24hr consumption as well as total morphine use.
Patients who received spinal diamorphine needed PCA for a lesser number of days and also had a reduced incidence of ileus, both of which would contribute to the enhanced recovery programme for these patients.
Patient satisfaction was higher with this technique than with PCA alone.
We would therefore recommend anaesthetists and surgeons to consider spinal diamorphine as part of a multimodal technique for perioperative pain relief in patients undergoing open midline general surgical laparotomy.
The impact of these techniques on acute and chronic pain has yet to be assessed.
This poster presents the Results of an audit to determine the incidence of pain following elective and emergency orthopaedic surgery.
The findings of the audit have highlighted the importance of the exact wording of pain assessment questions in patient interviews for research purposes.
Following this audit, we will investigate the effect of multiple biological and psychological factors on the prevalence and severity of short and long-term pain following elective orthopaedic surgery using a case-control paradigm the 4P study.
Methods Potentially eligible patients were identified from orthopaedic operating lists on the morning of surgery over a 4 week period.
Participants were approached on post-surgical day one.
Two pain scales were assessed for acceptability.
Either a verbal rating scale VRS of none, mild, moderate or severe or a numerical rating scale NRS of 0-10; with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable article source employed.
The sensitivity of this method of identifying cases and controls was compared to previous published data.
Results The VRS is used routinely in our trust, however patients in this study preferred to use the NRS.
Of the 130 patients identified, 73% 95 were assessed.
Of the assessed patients 75% 72 had elective surgery.
Of slot wireless cards sd, 54% 39 were male with a mean age of 58yrs.
The mean age for female elective patients was 63yrs.
For trauma patients the mean ages were lower: 60yrs for females and 41yrs for males.
The trauma patient group included 60% 14 females and 40% 9 males.
In this group, 64% 9 of females presented with significant pain and 55% 5 of males.
Overall, 65% 47 of the elective patients and 60% 14 of the trauma patients experienced significant pain on movement since surgery.
Conclusion Significant pain on movement occurred in 60% of patients following orthopaedic surgery.
This survey aims to investigate the frequency and various aspects of the postoperative use of prolonged release analgesics currently in the UK, with a particular focus on fentanyl transdermal patches.
Methods A paper questionnaire survey was conducted during a national scientific anaesthetics meeting held in the UK in November 2013.
The questionnaire contained five questions regarding the use, dosage and timing of oral and transdermal strong opioids in the early post-operative setting, and the types of surgery.
Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the Results.
Results Of the 94 participants who returned the questionnaire, 71 75.
Use following major orthopaedic surgery predominated, often following neuraxial block or PCA.
The 71 affirmative responses revealed that the most commonly employed sustained release opioids were: oxycodone in 57 centres 80.
In ten of these 13 centres, the respondents reported routine use of transdermal fentanyl patches following total knee or hip replacement.
In most cases, the transdermal fentanyl patches were applied postoperatively in the first 24 hours, but two respondents reported pre-operative application.
Buprenorphine patches were used in two centres.
Conclusion This paper questionnaire survey confirms that the use of oral and transdermal sustained prolonged release strong opioid analgesic in the acute post-operative setting is becoming common in the UK.
Given previous experience and reported safety concerns over PCA Background opioid infusions, there is a case for urgent auditing, study and evaluation of the risk:benefit profile of this unlicensed and controversial use, with particular attention given to monitoring the safety of transdermal fentanyl in previously opioid naïve postoperative patients.
AAGBI together with Age Anaesthesia Association, British Orthopaedic Association and the College of Emergency Medicine released guidelines in 2011 to focus on the acute hospital episode, particularly the pre-operative period, intra-operative management and immediate postoperative phase.
The audit focuses on the recommendations related to perioperative analgesia.
Data was collected via patient notes including anaesthetic charts and prescription charts.
Patients with proximal femoral fractures who underwent surgical repair of the fracture were recruited.
A proforma was used to gather the relevant data.
This included demographic data, type of anaesthesia, use of opioids and route of administration, peripheral blocks used and post-operative analgesia prescribed.
Results 60 patients were recruited during the period.
Mean volume was 2.
All GA patients had a peripheral nerve block performed.
Postoperative, all patients had paracetamol prescribed.
All GA patients had fascia illiaca block.
The majority of patients had spinal anaesthesia which is common practice locally.
Diamorphine remains the preferred choice of adjuvant instead of fentanyl which is recommended.
There was a low rate of peripheral nerve blockade performed.
Codeine was still prescribed in a small number of patients.
The Results were presented at a joint anaesthetic-orthopaedic department meeting.
Greater awareness of the guidelines will increase the use of peripheral nerve blockade and avoiding use of codeine.
A re-audit is planned within the next 12 months.
Several reasons have been identified including inadequacies in education, absence of curriculum content related to pain management, and attitudes and beliefs related to chronic pain.
Physiotherapists play an integral role in pain management in terms of facilitating symptom control, improving functional independence and enhancing quality of life.
Methods International cross-sectional survey of 212 physiotherapy students who participated in four professional conferences from 2009-2012 was performed using Chronic pain attitudes and beliefs scale CPABS - a self-report questionnaire with 31 items statements about learn more here for each of which the person had to indicate the level at which he or she agreed or disagreed with each statement using a five-point Likert scale.
Factor-1 score indicated a biomedical dimension while factor-2 score indicated a behavioural dimension to pain.
Comparisons across individual and professional variables for both dimensions were done using one-way ANOVA and correlations were done using the Karl—Pearson co-efficient using SPSS version 16.
Results The overall factor 1 score was 57.
The female students had a higher behavioural dimension score 27.
Conclusion Physiotherapy students had a greater orientation toward the biomedical dimension of chronic pain than the behavioural dimension.
This difference was more pronounced in female students and, in those from developing countries.
The study findings have important curricular implications for physiotherapy and practical implications for pain education and management.
There is need for future studies in physiotherapy professionals, multidisciplinary perceptions, and evaluation of pain-related attitudes and beliefs across the globe.
Patients can be further classified by the anatomical site of pain e.
Methods Following tertiary referral, 17 consecutive patients with vulvodynia underwent pelvic floor muscle assessment by the pelvic pain physiotherapist to establish the distribution of trigger points.
Results Of the 17 patients, 2 had no trigger points.
None of the 9 patients with generalised vulvodynia had provocative factors but in contrast 6 of the 8 75% patients with focal vulvodynia had one or more provocative factors such as penetrative intercourse or insertion of internal tampons.
The remaining 15 patients had trigger points distributed as follows: iliococcygeus 86.
Conclusion The majority of patients with vulvodynia are likely to have trigger points in their pelvic floor muscles ranked in descending order: the iliococcygeus, pubococcygeus and puborectalis.
These need attention by the physiotherapist as part of a multimodal approach to the management of vulvodynia.
However, practical, brief clinical tools for this purpose within musculoskeletal health are lacking.
We aimed to develop and validate a musculoskeletal PROM MSK-PROM to add to the widely used EQ5D-5L quality of life measure that was suitable for evaluating care and also monitoring patient progress within community healthcare settings.
Methods There were two phases; https://bannerven.com/slot/no-slot-with-swys-support-found-barclays.html and validation.
In Phase 1 two consensus workshops to identify and prioritise the key domains for inclusion in the toolan online consultation survey with relevant stakeholders, and two face validity workshops to test the readability and comprehension of the draft tool were used.
In Phase 2 we tested the reliability and responsiveness of the draft tool with a prospective cohort of adults attending musculoskeletal physiotherapy services in the West Midlands region, and discussed acceptability and feasibility with samples of participating patients and clinicians.
Items from the EQ-5D-5L mapped to five of these domains and six additional new single items were developed.
The feedback workshop confirmed the tool was acceptable and feasible to patients and clinicians.
Conclusion A new PROM has been developed using domains that matter the most to musculoskeletal patients, clinicians and service managers, and has been shown to be valid and reliable for use in musculoskeletal physiotherapy practice.
The Keele MSK-PROM tool will be made freely available for clinical use.
We also found that this effect was positively correlated with pain catastrophising scores, i.
For this reason, we suggested that, compared to low catastrophisers, patients with high pain-catastrophising scores may be more affected by negative expectancy suggestions even if these suggestions were subsequently violated by more positive ones.
Pain catastrophising may be the mechanism in which prior negative expectancy has its distorting effect on positive messages.
In our current study, we aim to explore this relation further, by investigating to what extent catastrophising influences the effect of prior negative expectancy cues on a given pain stimulus.
Methods Initial screening and volunteer recruitment: This screening was aimed to recruit two groups of high vs.
This was done by asking the initial participants to complete the pain catastrophising scale PCS 2.
Participants scoring in the upper 25% high catastrophisers and the lower 25% low catastrophisers are selected.
The study consisted of 2 major sessions; each was divided to 2 small blocks in which the expectancy paradigm was applied figure1.
In the second part of the study, a distraction sensory focusing task was applied in critical trials only.
After each laser stimulus, participants rated their felt pain level on a 0-10 numerical scale.
EEG recording was obtained during the study.
Preliminary analysis Pain ratings: ANOVAs analysis showed a Significant effect of expectancy with a p value 0.
No significant effect of the group was found.
EEG analysis: Laser-evoked potentials LEPs were generated at Cz electrodes, In the low-pain catastrophising group there was no difference between the two conditions before and after the task LEP peak N2while in the high-pain catastrophising group there was a reduction in the LEP peak N2particularly in the prior negative expectancy condition after applying the pain catastrophising manipulation task.
Conclusion Although Analysis is still on-going, EEG Results suggest that High pain catastrophisers show a higher pain response in the prior negative expectancy condition, an effect that was significantly reduced by the distraction task and was not present in the low pain catastrophisers.
This suggests that Pain catastrophising may be the mechanism in which prior negative expectancy has canyon australia distorting effect on positive messages.
For those whose symptoms do not spontaneously resolve, long-term residual symptoms source impairment are common.
This leads to problems with defining recovery from CRPS and evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions in those with chronic disease.
An international consortium was convened, funded via Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome Association and the Netherlands CRPS patient group, comprising of Patient Research Partners PRPsclinicians and academics to define recovery, and the priorities for recovery, from the perspective of patients with CRPS.
We report here the qualitative data from the first round of a two-stage Delphi process.
check this out received a letter of invitation, pack of self-report questionnaires and pre-paid envelope to return documentation to their country specific site.
Qualitative responses to the latter two open statements were anonymised and translated as required within each country prior to this web page to the UK for content analysis via NVivo.
A study sub-group including PRPs ensured consistency and agreement with the aggregated top 50% themes under ICF codes for recovered 60 items and non-recovered 28 items responses.
The most dominant themes for recovery for participants were Activities e.
CRPS related symptoms including pain with External factors e.
The psychological consequences of persistent severe pain appeared less important for our patient group.
The reason for this needs further exploration.
PRPs in this study proposed that psychological factors would automatically be resolved if physical function improved.
Future work of this Delphi study will identify the top priorities of recovery from the thematic list and how patient demographics and current health status may influence this.
The syndrome is also associated with other conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, hypermobility syndrome and widespread pain syndrome.
This diagnostic component is potentially overlooked when the medical referral is focussed on a specific pain complaint.
The postulated pathophysiological mechanism is based on the development of central sensitisation.
The importance of identifying this phenomenon was recently demonstrated in a study on shoulder impingement surgery where its presence had a significantly negative impact on surgical outcome.
A questionnaire called the Central Sensitisation Inventory has recently been developed and psychometrically validated as a screening tool to help identify the presence of the syndrome.
The authors were keen to assess the potential utility of introducing this questionnaire within a specialist pain clinic.
Methods The Central Sensitisation Inventory CSI was completed by all new patients attending a multidisciplinary pain management centre in South West England over a 4 week period in autumn 2013.
This study was approved by the institutional R+D department.
The CSI was completed independently by each patient prior to the specialist consultation in addition to the other two questionnaires routinely used Brief Pain Inventory and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Following the consultation, the authors scored the CSI and documented the relevant diagnoses made by the specialist.
Both the specialist comments and GP referral letter were reviewed to confirm whether a Central Sensitisation Syndrome had been verified by a clinician.
The authors used the threshold score of 40 to support the diagnosis of CSS as recommended by the developers of the CSI.
The individual scores ranged from 0-100.
Results 148 questionnaires were processed.
Two forms were rejected with incomplete documentation and inability to access to medical notes.
The age range of the cohort was: 19-93, with a mean age of 50.
A further 8 5.
The CSI scores obtained ranged from: 1-90.
The mean CSI score for those clinically diagnosed with CSS was 59.
For CSI scores 40.
Conclusion The CSI demonstrated good sensitivity for patients clinically diagnosed with CSS: only 2 marginally failed to score 40.
The data suggests that CSS is an extremely common presentation to this specialist clinic with clinicians typically failing to recognise its presence.
Patients with Central Sensitisation Syndrome typically have ongoing physical or emotional stressors.
The concomitant diagnosis of depression is clearly more common in those positively identified.
Overlooking this syndrome using a more limited clinical focus may well result in suboptimal therapeutic strategies impacting on quality of life and cost.
The CSI could make this metaphorical elephant in the room more visible!
Their use in the short or medium term has been demonstrated to provide symptomatic benefit in non-cancer pain.
There has been a dramatic increase in the use of opioid for chronic non-malignant pain, with an increase of ~600% in opioids prescribed in the US from 1997 to 2007.
Controversy exists about long term efficacy, particularly in view of potential adverse effects, including iatrogenic dependence, tolerance and addiction, In addition to commonly suffered side effects such as constipation and nausea, there is a greater awareness of the potential of endocrine suppression.
We have implemented a pilot opioid review clinic to allow a formal assessment of efficacy and adverse effects in individual patients on strong opioid medication.
The aim of this report is to assess whether problems with opioid use can be usefully assessed using this mode.
Methods A pilot clinic was set up and run over a period of 6 months to review patients in the Lothian Chronic Pain Service on strong just click for source, referred by the relevant pain consultant.
Patients were sent clinic appointments, in addition to their routine follow up appointments.
Results 56 patients were offered appointments, of which 37 attended.
Endocrine abnormalities were found in total of 12 patients 8 males, 4 females.
Other side effects found were constipation 54% https://bannerven.com/slot/moto-e-2nd-slots.html, drowsiness 29%muscle jerks 18% and hallucination and vivid dreams 10%.
Out of 37 patients seen, 30 patients had some change in management including endocrine referrals.
Conclusion The high intervention rate source patients on strong opioids, in addition to their routine appointments, would indicate that there is a role for this type of clinic.
Finding endocrine abnormalities in 32% patients within this cohort suggests that all patients on strong opioids should have routine endocrine blood tests.
We did not find any correlation between type or dose of opioid and endocrine abnormality.
Overall it is evident from above data that by attending opioid review clinic, patients have an improved and safe quality of care delivered by health care professionals.
Category: Cancer Pain Alison Twycross 1, Roslyn Parker 2,1, Anna Williams 3, Faith Gibson 1,3 1London South Bank University, London, UK, 2Kings College, London, UK, 3Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK Background Children with cancer experience pain from their disease, treatment and procedures as well as psychological distress associated with cancer.
Advances in treatment mean children are increasingly cared for by their parents at home during cancer therapies, leading to a shift in responsibility from healthcare professionals to parents.
Methods A rapid structured review of the literature was undertaken.
Electronic databases searches PsychInfo, CINAHL, PubMed and EMBASE using the following search terms: child OR children OR pediatric OR paediatric, AND cancer pain.
To ensure relevant papers were not missed in the database the reference list of each included article was searched.
A quality assessment was also conducted.
Books, book chapters, commentaries, and dissertations were also excluded from the review.
Results Forty-five papers were included.
Pain is regularly cited as the most prevalent symptom.
However, studies have reported on inconsistent variables and so a single prevalence figure is difficult to determine.
Parents find dealing with their child in pain emotionally distressing and demanding.
There is a need for better education on how to manage pain for parents.
Limited research has been carried outside the healthcare setting.
Conclusion Children continue to experience pain throughout their cancer trajectory.
This paper has revealed methodology as well as findings that indicate further research is needed to explore parental roles and their experiences of delivering care in the home.
In many cases the object of loss is obvious e.
Theories of loss have been associated with long-term health problems including chronic pain.
Helping individuals to understand loss and its impact on their life may help them manage their pain and reconstruct their future.
A focus group from the local chronic pain support group and a senior teaching fellow from University of Southampton have worked together to develop an interactive Pain Education Tool PET which has been designed to help people with chronic pain adjust to changes and losses that can be associated with developing and living with chronic pain.
The PET is an information booklet which contains an interactive task.
Methods The PET was developed in accordance with the nine principles of effective deliberative public engagement.
Regular meetings of the focus group followed on from initial discussions of the impact that loss and stages of grief can have on individuals with chronic pain.
A draft PET was developed via a series of emails and meetings, all members of the focus group identified roles and responsibilities in this development.
Such roles included researching, writing content, contributing personal experiences, compilation of the material and booklet layout and design.
The draft PET was then presented to the chronic pain support group for initial feedback.
The support group was asked to fill out evaluation forms and their feedback was discussed.
The design of the PET was developed further based on the feedback and an interactive task was added.
Results The PET is a unique tool designed to actively engage users and promote reflection on the impact of the pain experience.
The main aims of the PET are to help individuals live with pain and appreciate the impact of loss associated with chronic pain.
There has https://bannerven.com/slot/snow-honeys-slots.html great interest in the potential of the PET and currently there is other no such intervention available.
There is a need and a potential market for the PET which includes patient groups, pain management courses and specialist pain management clinics, it also has the potential to be used for other long-term conditions.
Funding for initial printing of the PET has been provided by NAPP Pharmaceuticals.
Enterprise funding has also been secured from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Southampton to enable a study to be undertaken to evaluate the PET and provide evidence regarding the benefits of this intervention.
Conclusion Presenting the concepts of loss, grief and their associated stages in a generalised context and making them accessible to people as an interactive, educational tool may help them to live with and manage their chronic pain.
It is also hoped that by using the PET people with chronic pain will be able to gain a new and positive perspective on their pain experience, including reorganising their achievements and reconstructing the future.
In a recent survey of UK healthcare courses, pain education accounted for less than 1% of hours on some programmes and only two schools had fully implemented the International Association for the Study of Pain curriculum Briggs et al.
Eur J Pain 2011;15:789-95.
The Advancing the Provision of Pain Education and Learning APPEAL study, guided by an expert taskforce of pain and education specialists under the leadership of the European Pain Federation EFIC®is a comprehensive Europe-wide review of pain education in all undergraduate medical schools in 15 countries.
These findings have informed the APPEAL expert taskforce, who have issued a call to action to improve pain education.
Here, we compare data for pain teaching between UK medical schools and those in other European countries.
Methods This study consisted of two phases.
Information was sourced from curricula and websites including school and government websites, student forums and university guides.
Supplementary information was obtained via follow-up phone calls or emails.
To explore and validate the quantitative research, phase 2 conducted June-September 2013 comprised qualitative, in-depth telephone interviews with deans, teaching staff and final-year undergraduates from up to 12 representative schools in each of 10 countries excluding Bulgaria, Netherlands, Portugal, Romania and Sweden.
There was pain teaching in 68% of UK schools; this was lower than in other countries 70% in Belgium to 100% in 9 countries, including Franceexcept Bulgaria 60%.
Where available, pain education generally only featured within compulsory, non-pain-specific modules.
Only 11% of UK schools had specific pain modules; this incidence varied across Europe, being highest in France 87% and lowest in Belgium, Denmark, Ireland and Poland 0%.
Conclusion These APPEAL study data show that pain education in the UK and Europe remains limited and inconsistent across schools and countries.
Few UK schools offer dedicated pain modules, and training generally only occurs within non-pain-specific courses.
Although schools use a range of teaching Methods, the focus on examinations might emphasize recall of theoretical knowledge over demonstrating clinical competence.
The APPEAL expert taskforce has made three recommendations to improve pain teaching: establish a European-wide framework for pain education, introduce compulsory pain teaching for undergraduates, and improve the documentation of pain teaching.
In view of the increased focus on delivering person centred care Francis Report, 2013, Quality Strategy, 2010 it was determined that patient views of this new service should be evaluated.
Methods Twenty five participants, from a cohort of 121 patients, were randomly recruited over a six month period.
The selected participants were invited to attend an interview with an independent interviewer.
Prior to recruitment, appropriate ethical approval was granted.
Of the twenty-five recruited, fifteen patients completed interviews.
At this point it was felt that data saturation was reached.
The process involves participants selecting up to five emotional description words from word boards in response to five questions about their experience of the group session.
Notes were taken throughout the interview by a non-participating data collector, typed up and member checked by both the interviewer and participant.
Data was analysed using a seven stage thematic approach in which common themes were coded and grouped.
Results Three key themes emerged.
Initial uncertainty and enquiry about the sessions - much of which was centred on the shift from the traditional clinic appointment to being invited to a group.
Feelings of inclusion and support - participants appeared to engage with meeting others, the sharing of knowledge from staff and staff facilitating patient stories within the group.
Subordinate themes indicated greater positivity around the next step in their treatment and a feeling of being listened to.
It was clear that patients found the sessions beneficial and they provided an effective basis for further physiotherapy management.
The sessions mirrored the Quality Strategy 2010providing information that enhances patient understanding and self-management.
In addition, waiting times have improved and are now in line with the targets of the health board.
Future work includes gathering of real time feedback and also expansion of evaluation methodology across the wider pain service.
Category: Education Zara Hansen 1, Jane Kidd 1, Sallie Lamb 1,2 1University of Warwick, Coventry, UK, 2University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Background Low back pain LBP is a common problem for which Cognitive Behavioural Therapy CBT has shown potential benefits.
Due to limited access to CBT qualified professionals, simplified CB approaches are being tested, often delivered by physiotherapists.
The Cognitive Therapy Scale - Revised - Pain CTS-R-Pain is a validated tool click to see more the assessment of competency in physiotherapists delivering a cognitive behavioural approach in LBP.
It provides a theorised framework for competency development and assessment.
Furthermore, it affords a means to explore influences upon competence and the relative importance of physiotherapist competence in patient clinical outcome, the focus for this study.
Methods The Back Skills Training trial BeST was a large randomised controlled trial which tested a group based cognitive behavioural approach for moderate to severely troublesome LBP lasting longer than 6 weeks.
Health professionals were trained over 2 days on the delivery of the structured, manualised intervention.
Audio recordings were made of 17 group sessions delivered by physiotherapists.
The 17 group sessions related to 11 physiotherapists and 136 participants.
Each recording underwent assessment of competency level using the CTS-R-Pain.
Competency scores were then used in a series of univariate and multivariate analyses including a linear regression model using data collected as part of the BeST trial.
In a linear regression model, 33% of the variance in patient outcome, using the 12 month change score of the Roland Morris Questionnaire RMQcould be attributed to the covariates with significant predictors of positive outcome being higher baseline disability RMQhigher baseline fear avoidance beliefs FABQbeing in work, and less therapist years since qualification.
Only 1% of the variance in patient outcome score could be attributed to therapist competence.
Conclusion These findings indicate that specific or deliberate practice in CB approaches increases physiotherapist competence.
Further research is required to explore why greater years since qualification were associated with poorer patient outcome and also the role of venue on therapist competence.
Most trials of CBT for a range of conditions have failed to find a correlation between competence and clinical outcome, more so in manualised approaches.
Whilst there may be many methodological reasons for this lack of association within clinical trials, it may also point to competence being less important in the delivery of the BeST trial intervention.
Cancer is more prevalent in an ageing population.
People with cancer experience complex problems including pain.
Pain is a significant concern for many people living and dying with cancer, and may be of particular concern for older people who may have complex needs.
There is growing evidence that that older people experience high level of unmet need generally and sub-optimal pain in particular.
Despite knowing that cancer and cancer treatment can cause pain there is limited knowledge of how older people experience cancer pain and how this affects their daily lives.
Methods The study aims to capture the experiences of pain of older people with cancer, consider how the older people construct the experience of cancer and how this is informed by their expectations and experiences.
A qualitative diary-interview study was conducted with purposively selected older people who had been diagnosed with cancer and were in receipt of specialist palliative care.
A two week page-a-day diary informed a subsequent interview to ensure holistic and person focused data about experience.
The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed.
The diary and interview data analysis was informed by the tenets of IPA interpretative phenomenological analysis to capture the individual and lived experience.
Results Presented here are some early findings from this exploratory and descriptive study.
Older people are reluctant to self identify as living with worsening cancer pain and unwilling to express and discuss their pain as a problem, rather something to adapt and live with.
Carers and or health care professionals may reinforce vulnerable and stoic stereotypes through gatekeeping with associated stances of protection and advocacy.
The participants appear to be satisfied with the care provision for symptom management.
However, the convention of stoic ageing is knowingly maintained with occasional glimpses of vulnerability.
This image contrasts with the presented and perceived representation of older people with cancer as vulnerable.
Conclusion Collecting data about pain from older people who may be vulnerable and in receipt of specialist palliative care has ethical and practical challenges.
Representation of the voice of older people through a diary may help the individual to present their experience more effectively to a third party.
Understanding of the variation in the individual experience may advance our understanding of pain and end of life care.
Medications to relieve pain and discomfort are important for pain patients.
In fact, most patients rely on pain treatments to improve their symptoms and to raise their overall quality of life.
For patients with less severe pain, pain treatments may result in complete pain relief.
However, at present, these patients are missed in population-based studies of pain.
Furthermore, the true pain severity of those who report current pain is often disguised by their treatments.
As a result of both of these, the burden of pain in general populations may be underestimated.
Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in the general population in Grampian, north-east Scotland.
Study participants received a pre-notification letter, followed by a survey pack one week later.
A reminder survey was distributed to non-respondents two weeks after the initial mailing.
Current pain severity was measured with a 10-point VAS scale, as was perceived pain without any treatments.
Differences in population estimates were analysed.
Of those who reported no current pain, 12.
The median pain severity among current pain patients was 3 IQR: 2; 6.
Conclusion Population estimates of pain derived from connect signals and pain studies underestimate the true burden of pain.
We have shown that estimates of pain prevalence increased by 6% after identifying individuals that gained complete pain relief by the use of treatments.
With approximately 60 million people living in the UK, these new instruments would identify more than 3.
Up to 80% of pain reported in that age group originates in the musculoskeletal system.
The impact of pain increases with age and may be associated with an increased mortality risk.
Phenotypic frailty, a geriatric syndrome characterised by declining function across a number of physiological systems weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slow walking speed and low physical activity may mediate the relationship between pain and mortality.
This study tested the hypothesis that pain was associated with mortality and that this relationship was mediated by frailty.
Vital status was determined up to 2012.
Path analysis tested for mediation of the association between pain and mortality by frailty.
All analyses were adjusted for putative confounders age, gender, wealth and education.
Results The mean age of the sample was 70.
The strength of this association was not attenuated following adjustment for age, gender, wealth and education 1.
The diagnosis is made from the pain history using International Headache Society diagnostic criteria of three or more episodes of brief, severe electric shock or stabbing pain which can be triggered by innocuous stimuli to the same side of the face.
Although the pain is characteristic there is wide variation in the published incidence and prevalence rates.
There is a tendency for other severe facial pain which could for example, be secondary to dental infection or a Trigeminal Autonomic Encephalgia to be labelled as TN.
We undertook a retrospective audit aimed at looking at the prevalence of patients undergoing trigeminal ganglion and trigeminal nerve root microvascular decompression operations at Derriford Hospital, Plymouth between 2010-2013.
These patients have a certain diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia and allows the calculation of a population incidence rate for significant surgical treatments for Devon and Cornwall.
This is facilitated by a local Map of Medicine referral pathway.
Surgical treatment options include Trigeminal ganglion treatments and microvascular decompression MVDand visit web page for radiosurgery.
Retrospective data covering a 3 year period 2010-2013 for patients seen in the Pain Management Clinic was collected.
We took demographic data such as age, sex, diagnosis, prevalent side and pain distribution.
Short term outcomes of patients who had Trigeminal ganglion treatment with Thermocoagulation or glycerol injection were analysed and compared with published demographic data for TN patients.
The number, age and sex of microvascular decompression and radiosurgery patients were also reviewed.
Of these 143 patients had TN including with 15 having Multiple Sclerosis and TN From 143 patient 68 patients subsequently progressed to Trigeminal ganglion treatments.
This is equivalent to a surgical incidence rate of 1: 18,500 population.
There is a need to obtain data about the prevalence of neuropathic pain among diabetes patients in Libya to plan appropriate national pain management strategies.
There have been no estimates of the prevalence of neuropathic pain among diabetes patients in Libya.
The aim of this survey was to estimate the prevalence of neuropathic pain in patients with Diabetes type 1 and 2 attending outpatient clinics and to determine the demographic factors associated with these patients.
Methods Link Arabic version of the Self-complete Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs S-LANSS questionnaire was given to patients with diabetes from 1 Sept - 02 Dec 2013 in the Diabetic Unit in Derna.
Pain intensity was measured using a visual analogue scale.
Results A total of 223 patients agreed to participate in the survey.
The overall prevalence of neuropathic pain among diabetes patients was estimated to be 43.
The proportion of females with NeuP was 54.
The mean pain intensity±SD was 7.
The prevalence of neuropathic pain increased with age, from 6% in the 20-29 year age group to 45.
Neuropathy was associated with the duration of diabetes, and was present in 28.
Conclusion Neuropathic pain is a common complication associated with diabetes.
It increases with both age and duration of diabetes.
There is a need to improve management of neuropathic pain with increased use of neuropathic pain drugs.
The operation is often considered an effective intervention for pain, but recent studies indicate that up to 20% of patients experience chronic post-surgical pain CPSP after total knee replacement; this equates to around 16,000 new cases of CPSP in the UK each year.
Despite the high number of patients with CPSP after knee replacement, ongoing work within our Unit suggests that there is little standardisation in service provision, with a lack of clear clinical pathways for the identification, assessment and management of patients with CPSP.
Methods Healthcare professionals in a major acute care NHS Trust with clinical experience of working with patients experiencing CPSP after total knee replacement were eligible to participate in the study.
Study information was disseminated to potential participants through direct e-mails, a local professional organisation and at clinical meetings.
Four focus groups with a total of 18 healthcare professionals were held.
Participants included seven physiotherapists, three surgical registrars, two consultant orthopaedic surgeons, two nurses, one occupational therapist, one orthotist, one consultant pain specialist and one clinical psychologist.
Focus groups explored referral pathways and service provision for patients with CPSP after total knee replacement.
With written consent from participants, focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed.
Anonymised transcripts were managed using QSR NVivo 10 and analysed using thematic analysis.
Current access to services was dependent on patients taking a proactive approach and there were no clear entry points to post-surgical pain services.
Identifying ways to improve services, participants described specialist services, specifically multidisciplinary pain clinics and pain management programmes, as having a vital and specific role in helping patients with CPSP.
By corollary, better services would provide a joined slotted steel angle pathway that would assist patients and healthcare professionals involved in their care.
This small-scale study complements ongoing work that highlights the diversity of services for CPSP after knee replacement across the UK, in which some examples of clear pathways are apparent.
Future research is needed to assess the impact of clear referral pathways and integrated service provision for patients with CPSP after total knee replacement.
The operation is usually conducted to relieve pain and improve function, but recent studies indicate that up to 20% of patients experience chronic post-surgical pain CPSP after total knee replacement; this equates to around 16,000 new cases of CPSP in the UK each year.
The wider literature on chronic pain indicates that people with chronic pain encounter patchy service provision.
People with CPSP after knee replacement have already undergone major surgery for pain, and follow-up after surgery may have a role in care and pain management.
However, we do not know what services are on offer to this group, nor whether there is consistency in service provision including identification of need and any associated referral processes.
We therefore conducted a survey to scope current UK service provision for patients with CPSP after total knee replacement.
Methods This ongoing project is funded through a National Institute for Health Research Programme Development Grant on the treatment and management of chronic pain after total knee replacement the STAR programme.
The project was conducted as a service evaluation of services at high volume NHS orthopaedic centres across the UK.
The 23 NHS orthopaedic centres that conduct 500 or more primary total knee replacements per year were identified from the National Joint Registry.
Contact was made with a key health professional at each centre who was familiar with the processes of post-operative assessment and follow-up.
A structured telephone interview was conducted to obtain information about usual patient pathways at the click centres.
Questions focused on identification, triage, treatment, management, and referral of patients with CPSP after total knee replacement.
Information was recorded on a standardised proforma and entered into an Access database.
Information was then collated and summarised in Excel.
Data collection is ongoing, with completion by February 2014.
All centres routinely follow-up patients at 6 weeks after total knee replacement, although the provision and timing of subsequent appointments vary.
The majority of centres do not have a specific time point at which patients are diagnosed with CPSP; in those that do, time points range from 4.
When assessing pain levels, most centres click the following article patient narrative, and there is some use of a standardised tool, most frequently a visual analogue scale.
Four centres reported using a standardised click to see more for assessment of patients with CPSP, and two centres reported use of a standardised protocol for management and treatment.
Treatment and management options offered to patients vary between and within centres, and include further orthopaedic interventions, referral to pain management services, analgesia review, and referral for physiotherapy.
Conclusion This survey of current service provision for patients with CPSP after total knee replacement identified national variation in the identification, assessment and management of these patients.
Although some centres have developed a care pathway for patients with CPSP, the majority of centres lack standardised protocols to guide care provision.
This highlights the potential to develop and evaluate standardised referral pathways and integrated service provision for patients with CPSP after total knee replacement.
click an ageing population with increasing life expectancy, it can be hypothesised that the prevalence may increase over time and that affected individuals will live longer with chronic pain.
In the future, intensive care units are likely to encounter a greater proportion of patients with chronic pain as well as other chronic illness.
While the focus of critical care is most often surrounding acute issues, attention to chronic illness also plays an important role.
With chronic pain now being recognised as a condition in its own right, it should continue to be managed even during acute illness wherever possible.
Methods Glasgow Royal Infirmary GRI Intensive Care Unit ICU is a 20 bedded ward split into east and west areas.
It is a mixed level 2 and 3 unit accepting medical, surgical, elective and emergency admissions.
All patients admitted to GRI ICU in 2012 who had a chronic pain diagnosis and as part of their home read more prescribed amitriptyline, gabapentin or pregabalin were identified.
CareVue, the electronic patient monitoring and charting system used in GRI ICU allowed extraction of data from patients records.
The admission records were reviewed.
We collected data on drug discontinuation, if drug was re prescribed, time taken to re prescribe, and any documented reasons for discontinuation.
Results During 2012 there were 962 patients admitted to GRI ICU.
There were 102 10.
These drugs were re prescribed in 74 cases 72.
The mean time between admission and re-prescription was 48.
The median time was 3 hours and the mode was 1 hour.
In 28 cases 27.
In 8 patients 7.
Conclusion Mismanagement of pain in ICU may cause long term sequelae including chronic pain and PTSD.
Reassuringly, in our unit 92.
However, we have identified that some are experiencing long periods without their usual medication, and in some instances the drugs are not being re-prescribed at all.
Management of pain is a fundamental standard of care and we aim to improve pain related prescribing in our unit through education.
We propose the inclusion of a protocol for management of chronic pain medications within our department.
It carries significant morbidity, with reduction in quality of life, poor function and interference with work and leisure activities, and its incidence varies widely depending on the type of surgery being performed.
The General Medical Council GMC gives guidance to doctors on the issues of consent for surgical procedures.
The GMC states the need for doctors to tell patients if an intervention might result in a serious adverse outcome, including medium or long term pain, as well as how patients should document their consent, whether that is written, verbal or implied.
Methods Using computerised theatre records, we retrospectively identified all patients that underwent a surgical procedure with an anaesthetist present at Blackpool Victoria Https://bannerven.com/slot/alexa-slot-filling.html, between January 1st 2013 and January 31st 2013.
This included 1576 patients and from this group we further selected those patients that were undergoing a procedure with a high risk of CPSP.
drilled slotted or both procedures included operations from general, breast and vascular surgery, trauma and orthopaedics, ENT, gynaecology, and urology.
Our sample group was 220 patients and due to availability of notes we were able to look at 211 patient records.
We retrospectively looked at consent forms to identify which patients had documented written consent for the serious or frequently occurring risks of surgery including chronic pain, acute pain and nerve damage.
Results Of the 211 consent forms analysed, 58% were from general surgery, 29% from trauma and orthopaedics, 7% from gynaecology, 3% from ENT and 3% from urology.
All of these were for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.
Conclusion A significant number of patients are undergoing surgical procedures that have a high incidence of CPSP.
When looking retrospectively at consent forms for patients undergoing surgery with a high risk of CPSP, only a small proportion of consent forms are confirming that the risk of CPSP has been discussed with patients prior to surgery.
CPSP is a serious consequence of surgery and patients undergoing high risk surgery should be informed of the possibility of developing CPSP during the consent procedure, and this should be documented on the surgical consent form, in accordance with nationally approved guidance on the consent process.
The GRIPs report of 2007 found that despite 4 previous reports, provision of Pain Management Services remained patchy with a lack of availability of multidisciplinary care.
Methods The Scottish Chronic Pain Steering Group was set up in 2009 to direct service improvement.
A National Lead Clinician coordinated this with support read article Healthcare Improvement Scotland and the Scottish Government.
Subgroups were established on education, measurement and research.
We developed a Scottish Service Model for Chronic Pain, recognising that most people with chronic pain are managed in the community and Primary Care Level 1 - Advice and Information about pain and what to do about it.
Anyone can access these services from home or community services.
Level 2 - When help from a GP or therapist is needed.
Level 3 - For those needing more specialist help from a chronic pain management service.
Level 4 - Highly specialised help Pain Services were encouraged to develop Service Improvement Groups SIGs with government funding over an initial 2 year period.
Collaboration with the RCGP, MSK and other services was sought.
Results All Boards in Scotland have signed up to developing a SIG, tasked with implementing the Scottish Service Model for Chronic Pain.
GPs and pharmacists and patients are involved in SIGs, contributing to the development of pain assessment and management guidelines.
Pain Association Scotland, a voluntary group have been able to establish local groups.
Chronic pain service development will be part of Local Delivery Plans for Boards.
Guidelines are being agreed for referral and management for Level 4 specialised treatments.
The Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network have developed a SIGN Guideline for the Management of Chronic Pain, published 12.
The Scottish Pain Research Community has held three successful ASMs.
The Research Sub-group of the Steering group has obtained a CSO grant to research on opiate prescribing.
Next steps are to establish an autonomous national network of pain services.
Conclusion We are fortunate in Scotland to have a pain management community which is proactive and well known to one another.
We are working on strengthening networks, on achieving better collaboration, communication and sharing good practice.
A coordinated approach by the Chronic Pain Steering Group, with support from Healthcare Improvement Scotland and the Scottish Government, has resulted in the establishment of improvement groups in every Scottish Health Board, with action plans to establish the service model.
Anxiety has been associated with the experience of pain, especially in women although there are few studies that investigated the relationship between anxiety and gender differences on response to experimentally-induced heat pain.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are differences in anxiety toward pain between male and female university students and whether this affects response to experimentally-induced heat pain.
A thermode linked to a ThermoSensory analyser II Medoc was placed on the skin over the thenar eminence to deliver heat stimuli.
Conclusion Gender differences in anxiety as measured by PASS 20 had no effect on experimental heat pain sensitivity response under the current experimental conditions.
Significant placebo responses have previously complicated the interpretation of clinical trial Results 2, leading to attempts to reliably identify placebo responders in clinical trials 3, 4.
To do this in clinical trials involving pain, a better understanding of the consistency of placebo analgesia is needed.
Placebo analgesic response has been shown please click for source be reproducible, when experimental conditions and placebo modality are kept stable 5.
However, a slight change in the context of the placebo i.
Furthermore, different placebo modalities can induce different magnitudes of responses, suggesting that placebo responses may be contextual, rather than subject dependent 7.
We investigated whether a change of placebo modality in a repeat experimental session, would affect the reproducibility of placebo analgesic response.
Methods The study consisted of two experimental sessions separated by a minimum of two weeks.
Participants received either a cream 10 in placebo group, 6 in control group or a tablet in the first session, which was then swapped in the second session.
Both placebo and control groups underwent the same experimental procedure; however the verbal instructions between them differed.
Experimental placebo analgesia was induced in the placebo groups using an established protocol 5, in which a sham analgesic treatment was paired with a conditioning phase of lower intensity laser stimuli.
This indicates that pain reduction was due to placebo analgesia and not habituation to the laser, in accordance with previous studies 5.
We defined a placebo responder as a subject in the placebo group, with a pain reduction greater than the mean of the control group.
There were 10 placebo responders in the first session, 80% of whom were also placebo responders in the second session.
Conclusion This study demonstrates that placebo analgesic response is consistent in individuals across different experimental sessions and modalities.
In contrast to previous findings 6, these Results provide evidence that the magnitude of placebo analgesic response is partly subject dependent and can therefore be predicted.
This has important implications for clinical trial design involving analgesics, as it provides evidence for the use of placebo screening before a trial, assisting the interpretation of Results.
It also provides the possible basis for identifying the genetic foundations of placebo analgesia, directing new fields of pharmacological research.
There appears to be a negative correlation between alpha power, and both the behavioural and electrophysiological responses to acute pain.
Increasing alpha power could hence decrease pain ratings and the amplitude of laser-evoked potentials, measurable through electroencephalography EEG.
Oscillatory frequencies can be modulated by visual entrainment, where brainwave frequencies adapt to the rhythm at which they are being stimulated.
Methods We recruited 32 healthy 16 maleright handed subjects with a mean age of 22.
The intensity of the stimulus was slowly increased from a level 0 to a level 7 on a 1-10 pain scale Laser intensity was kept constant, at baseline level 7, for the rest of the experiment.
After rating 20 baseline laser pulses, jackpots wins were subjected to four different visual stimulations: 1 Hz control8Hz low-alpha10Hz mid-alpha12Hz high-alpha.
Each visual stimulation lasted 10 minutes and was delivered in the form of flashing LED goggles.
The order of stimulations was randomised.
After every visual stimulation session, volunteers were asked to rate 20 heat laser pulses at their pre-determined level 7.
Results Ten minutes of visual alpha stimulation was enough to increase alpha power, with the largest effect at 10Hz.
After visual entrainment ERPs and behavioural pain ratings reduced significantly with the largest effect at 10Hz, followed by 8Hz.
Conclusion Both the behavioural pain ratings and laser evoked responses were significantly reduced compared to control after the 8Hz and 10Hz entrainment.
No significant difference was found after the 12Hz entrainment.
These Results are in line with previous findings demonstrating opposite effects of low and high alpha frequencies on pain perception 038 Characterisation of delayed onset of muscle soreness doms in the hand, wrist and forearm using a finger dynamometer.
Both concentric and eccentric contractions may produce DOMS with exercise intensity a key dependent factor.
DOMS may present in the first 24 hours as pain, stiffness, muscle tenderness, decreased strength and swelling with intensity peaking between 24 to 72 hours post exercise.
DOMS usually resolves in 5-7 days post-exercise.
DOMS is used to induce experimental pain although induction techniques result in considerable discomfort and disability in large muscle groups of the https://bannerven.com/slot/slot-truck-race-track.html arms and legs.
The aim of this pilot study was to characterize sensory and motor changes of DOMS using this induction- technique over a 48 hour period post exercise.
This was repeated following a 30 second rest.
Pain location varied between participants and included the index finder, thumb, palm, wrist, middle of forearm, upper arm m.
PPT was significantly lower in the affected arm immediately after exercise 1cm above the medial epicondyle and 1cm under the medial epicondyle and after 24 hours at the flexor digitorum profundus muscle belly medial.
Conclusion DOMS presented as localised sensory and motor changes in the arm, including pain at rest and on movement with lower continue reading to stimuli generating pressure pain.
The site s of pain varied between participants.
A larger sample is needed to statistically validate putative changes grip strength, skin sensitivity and forearm circumference.
Therefore, we plan to conduct a follow-up study using a larger sample size to characterise DOMS more fully as part of the development of an analgesic assay.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of TENS applied during the postoperative period after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery VATSin addition to opioids, for pain management.
Secondary outcome included evaluation of the feasibility of having postoperative care nurses who underwent a training session in TENS prior to the study apply TENS rather than a physical therapist.
Methods Seventy patients scheduled to undergo VATS were invited to participate in this controlled trial consisting of randomization between TENS plus opioids Group 1 or opioids alone Group 2 for 48 hours.
Select TENS Pain Management System Empi Inc was used.
Nurses placed 4 electrodes on or around the area of maximum pain.
One of 5 preset quick select program buttons was chosen and intensity adjusted until the patient was comfortable.
Outcome measures were pain scores taken hourly visual analogue scale, 0-10pain medication name and amount in oral morphine equivalents OME mg used for 48 hours, and satisfaction with pain control visual analogue scale, 0-10.
Level of opioid treatment and pain scores were compared between Group 1 and Group 2 using Fisher exact test, or mixed model method where appropriate.
Since this study represents an early-phase trial with a small sample size, we also used the Aickin separation test.
Results Fifty-six patients were enrolled, 40 completed the study.
Age, sex preoperative home pain medication and physical status were similar in both groups.
Pain scores and use of OME were not significantly different between the 2 groups during the first and second 24 hours.
Statistical analysis using the separation test described by Aickin showed that further research is worthwhile to evaluate the use of TENS in postoperative pain control for patients undergoing VATS.
At study completion, 65 nurses who applied TENS at some time during the study were mailed a satisfaction survey; 44 rated the level of ease or difficulty in using TENS, with a median of 5.
Conclusion The present study indicates that TENS used in addition to opioid treatment is a feasible approach and may be of benefit for postoperative pain reduction in patients undergoing VATS.
A larger, well-powered clinical trial is indicated to further evaluate the effects of TENS in the control of both postoperative VATS pain and opioid use.
Because delivering TENS therapy was a new skill for the nurses, their lack of familiarity with this technology may have diminished its efficacy.
In future studies, we plan to extend the number of training sessions to ensure optimal utilization of the device.
However, waiting times for THR can be considerable, and patients often experience significant pain during this time.
A pain self-management intervention may provide patients with the skills to enable them to manage their pain and its impact more effectively during the wait for surgery.
However, studies of arthritis self-management programmes have faced challenges because of low recruitment rates, poor intervention uptake, and high attrition rates.
Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial RCT to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-based pain self-management course for patients undergoing THR and assess the acceptability of the intervention.
Specific objectives were to assess trial design, ascertain recruitment and retention rates, identify barriers to participation, refine data collection Methods, and evaluate uptake and patient satisfaction with the course.
Methods Patients listed for a THR at the Avon Orthopaedic Centre in Bristol were sent a postal invitation about the study.
After recruitment, participants were randomised to attend a pain self-management course plus standard care or standard care only using a computer-generated randomisation system Minim.
The pain self-management course was delivered by Arthritis Care and consisted of two half-day group sessions prior to surgery and one full-day group session 2-4 months after surgery.
100 deposit no of slots vegas structured course evaluation questionnaire was completed by participants after the sessions.
Outcomes assessment was by postal questionnaire prior to surgery and 1-month, 3-months and 6-months after surgery.
Self-report resource use data were collected using a diary prior to surgery and inclusion of resource use questions in the 3-month and 6-month post-operative questionnaires.
Brief telephone interviews were conducted with consenting non-participants to explore barriers to participation.
Results Postal invitations were sent to 385 eligible patients and 88 patients consented to very slots garden review very 23% recruitment rate.
Participants had a mean age of 66 years and 65% were female.
Brief interviews with 57 non-participants revealed the most common reasons for non-participation were perceptions about the intervention and difficulties in getting to the hospital 4 slot wonder stars attend the course.
Of the 43 patients randomised to the intervention group, 28 attended the pre-operative pain self-management sessions and 11 attended the post-operative sessions.
Participant satisfaction with the course was high, and patients enjoyed the group format of continue reading course.
Retention of participants was acceptable, with 83% completing follow-up.
Questionnaire return rates were high at all assessment times 76-93%with the exception of the pre-operative resource use diary 35%.
Completion rates for the article source use questions varied by category and allowed for an economic perspective from the health and social care payer to be taken.
Conclusion Undertaking feasibility work for a RCT is labour-intensive; however this study highlights the importance of conducting such work.
Postal recruitment resulted in a low recruitment rate and brief interviews with non-participants provided valuable information on barriers to participation.
Embedding collection of resource use data within questionnaires resulted in higher completion rates than using resource use diaries.
While patients who attended the course gave positive feedback, attendance was low.
Findings from this feasibility study enable us to design successful definitive group-based RCTs in the future, ensuring the delivery of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence to inform service provision for patients undergoing THR.
The World Health Organisation WHO has set out clear guidelines in pain management with the analgesic ladder.
The NHS enhanced recovery pathway also recommends the use of NSAIDs post-operatively.
The aim of the study was to assess compliance with WHO guidelines in pain management of surgical patients and to assess the use of NSAIDs as adjuvant analgesics.
Methods Data was collected from 50 patients 23M:27F on surgical wards.
The data collected was for age, sex, surgical speciality, analgesia prescribed during inpatient stay and any contra-indications.
We compared the analgesia prescribed with the current WHO guidelines in pain management to assess whether the surgical department adheres to slots king spin />We also assessed the use of adjuvant analgesia in surgical patients.
These Results suggest that surgical doctors are not fully complying with the WHO pain ladder guidelines, and that a large proportion of patients are not being prescribed adjuvant analgesia despite having no contraindications to their use.
There are two possible reasons for this finding.
Firstly the notion that some surgeons are not enthusiastic about using certain types of analgesia due to the known side effects, such as the use of NSAIDs and their association with upper gastrointestinal bleeds.
Conclusion Although compliance with the WHO pain ladder is improving, pain management in surgical patients might be further improved by better compliance to WHO guidelines and by greater use of adjuvant analgesia as per the enhanced recovery pathway.
Our study would suggest that further research is required to evaluate whether complying with eye slot anaconda guidelines would hasten recovery, shorten hospital stay and enhance patient satisfaction.
Many CLBP management strategies have been proposed and trialled, but have at best achieved moderate success.
Novel interventions such as graded motor imagery GMImirror visual feedback MVF and sensory discrimination retraining SDR have been shown to facilitate correction of pathological cortical changes and improve symptoms in other chronic pain states.
However, little is known regarding the effectiveness of these treatment approaches in CLBP.
Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify and assess the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions which target cortical remapping in the management of CLBP.
Methods Data Sources: The electronic databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, OVID, PEDro, BNI, PsycINFO, HMIC, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched from their individual inception dates to September 2013.
Search strategies and eligibility criteria were developed using the standard PICO format.
All multiple participant study designs were considered and no language restrictions applied to maximise article retrieval.
Study Selection: Ten potential citations were identified electronically, with the addition of a 11 th via manual screening of the bibliography of relevant publications.
Their abstracts were subsequently screened for eligibility, and 5 articles ultimately identified for inclusion.
These comprised 3 randomised controlled trials RCTs1 randomised cross-over study, and a multiple case study design.
A qualitative synthesis of the methodological quality of each article was performed using the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme CASP criteria.
Article suitability for inclusion and their subsequent methodological analysis were both corroborated by a second, independent assessor.
Results The findings of this review suggest that interventions which specifically target cortical remapping such as GMI, MVF and SDR have slots cash cover for application in the management of CLBP.
A combined protocol, including components of all 3 interventions in combination with motor control retraining demonstrated clinically significant short-term benefits, and may represent the greatest potential.
However, these Results need to be replicated in a larger trial to confirm statistical significance.
Conclusion There is a paucity of robust literature which has examined the efficacy of these novel interventions in the management of CLBP.
The findings of the few studies which are currently available are encouraging.
GMI, MVF and SDR have been shown to be individually effective in reducing pain and improving function in CLBP.
Furthermore, a combined protocol, incorporating specific motor control retraining with components of all 3 treatment modalities may provide the best potential outcomes.
Further, robust research is needed to optimise treatment protocols and establish the cost-effectiveness and long-term efficacy of these interventions in CLBP.
Most commonly caused by rotator cuff tears, glenohumeral osteoarthritis and trauma, the pain is often prohibitively severe to allow compliance with physiotherapy, especially that pharmacotherapy frequently proves either ineffective or intolerable due to side effects.
As the Suprascapular nerve a branch of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus derived from C5 and C6 spinal nerves supplies 70% of the of the shoulder joint, blockade of the nerve by local anaesthetics or radiofrequency neurotomy has been an accepted treatment of shoulder pain, particularly in cases deemed inoperable due to surgical or medical reasons.
Self- administered, it consists of five questions assessing the pain severity and scored out of fifty, and eight for the limitation of function affecting upper extremity use scored out of eighty.
The higher the score the worse the pain and functional disability respectively.
After explanation and consent, the procedure was performed using continuous Rf for all patients.
Adopting the Gauchi landmark technique, the nerve was located as it winds around the scapular spine.
Results There were eight males and six females aged 43 to 92 years with a mean age of 74.
On their pre-procedure SPADI their pain score range was 30-50 with a mean of 37.
At 3 months, 5 patients did not return their questionnaire yet 4 out of them showed improvement in pain and function scores at six month.
Mean pain score was 28.
Mean Pain score 20.
None of the patients suffered any complications Conclusion Radiofrequency neurotomy of the suprascapular nerve, when assessed by a robust tool such as the SPADI questionnaire, proves to be an effective method in reduction of pain and improvement of function in patients complaining of chronic shoulder pain who are deemed unfit for surgery.
More important, its effects seem to be sustained over time.
Even in a subgroup of patients who did not derive any benefit initially at three months, their pain and disability scores improved at six months.
At present there are only guidelines for interventional techniques in the management of some aspects of chronic pain 2.
The aim of this audit was to look at current practice in a tertiary pain medicine unit, determine which interventional procedures are performed and assess their efficacy.
We also assessed the time scale to follow up after intervention, as there are no current, standardised national guidelines for post procedure follow up 3.
Methods 107 patients underwent therapeutic interventions for chronic pain by a single pain medicine consultant, between March 2012 and 2013, at Chelsea and Westminster Pain Centre.
Patients were divided have harrahs slot winners for six categories that included: mechanical low back pain MLBPlow back pain with neuropathy MLBPnlow back pain with radiculopathy MLBPrpure radiculopathy and myofascial pain.
Time to follow-up conducted by a pain nurse or doctor was calculated as a mean in months.
The efficacy of each intervention was assessed overall and within each pain category.
Results Patient categories are summarised in Graph1.
Mean time to follow-up was 3.
The intervention most performed was FJI Graph 2.
This was similar across all pain types Table 1 odds of winning a casino jackpot slots, except in MLBn, where the majority had only a partial response.
The majority were partially effective 83% requiring a repeat or alternative procedure after follow- up.
Again, none were associated with good therapeutic outcome Table3.
All patients with myofascial pain received TPI.
Conclusion Low back pain remains the most common cause for undergoing an interventional procedure.
The multifactorial aetiology means, no single intervention alone is of significant clinical benefit The efficacy of an intervention may be affected by the delay in timely post procedure follow up e.
We suggest implementing the BPS guideline for managing axial, mechanical low back pain 4.
The pathway suggests performing diagnostic medial branch blocks, with response assessed on the day of procedure, leading to a 2 nd diagnostic injection and ultimately a therapeutic radiofrequency denervation.
Current evidence pertaining to injection therapy is very limited.
Research outcomes may not translate into real-life clinical practice.
It was felt that the collection of specific data at consistent follow up intervals would provide valuable, and as accurate as possible information to demonstrate the effectiveness of these treatments.
The Results were entered onto a computer database, thus allowing for effective and accurate collation of the information gathered.
Methods The target sampling population was all patients undergoing injection therapy for the year 2012-13.
This was a change in practice for the clinicians involved, therefore patient entry into the database was staggered.
This may not reflect the total activity of the clinic.
Data was collected at 6 and 12 weeks via a telephone call.
Depending on the outcome of the information collected at 6 weeks, namely if any pain relief is presentthen a further telephone call was made at 12 weeks post treatment.
Data was collected prospectively by a named specialist pain nurse.
The primary outcome measure was pain relief.
Secondary outcomes were measured, consisting of - physical activity level, sleep quality, analgesia requirement and global perception of change as a result of the treatment.
Any adverse effects were also noted in the outcomes.
The data was then entered into our hospital database.
Results In terms of primary outcome, click to see more Results show that 65% of patients experienced analgesia for more than 6 weeks, with 53% of the total patient cohort still benefiting after 12 weeks.
Secondary outcomes showed that a third of patients were able to increase their physical activity.
There was an improvement in reported sleep quality in almost 40% of our patients as well as reduction in analgesia required.
Overall, 51% of patients felt that their situation had improved as a result of the intervention.
Conclusion Injection therapy has a fundamental iphone 6 card slot within the multi-modal treatment of chronic pain.
This data supports the benefits of injection therapy within our service.
Collecting the data at different time intervals as stated in our methodology above may not reflect the full effects of injection therapy.
Ongoing data collection may potentially help identify the patient group most likely to benefit from injection therapy in the future.
Current management continues to follow a biomedical model even when there is no underlying medical pathology to explain symptoms.
However these mechanistic approaches are ineffective and can be iatrogenic.
A growing evidence-base recognises the potential effectiveness of psychological interventions for COFP.
We sought to understand the processes involved in the experience of COFP and to develop a feasible and acceptable evidence-based intervention for managing COFP.
Methods We followed the Medical Research Council guidelines for development of complex interventions.
This involved a mixed method approach to gather quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform the development of the intervention.
The intervention was manualised and the manual followed the format of a previous intervention developed for chronic widespread pain.
CBT either alone or in combination with biofeedback improved long-term pain intensity, activity interference and depression compared with usual continue reading />The strength of evidence was weak and it was slot payouts casinos which components of the interventions were effective.
However management was limited to biomedical interventions.
Diagnosis was problematic but functional for all parties.
COFP was viewed as a non-dental problem and practitioners felt ill-equipped to manage it.
Current inadequacy in management led to frustration and disengagement from the clinician-patient relationship.
Referral was common and services chosen were rarely available.
Conclusion Current management of COFP is ineffective and unsatisfactory for both patients and practitioners.
Our intervention was acceptable to patients and allowed them to better understand and self-manage COFP.
In addition it could be feasibly delivered by both dental and non-dental professionals either face to face or over the telephone.
Further research is needed to understand the most cost-effective ways to implement psychological interventions for COFP within current medical and dental services.
These have the advantage of directly targeting the involved spinal nerve.
Infectious complications following selective nerve root injections although rare have been reported in the literature.
This is the case report of a 78 year old woman who unfortunately developed discitis following a selective nerve root injection.
She was referred to the chronic pain services in 2010 with low back pain and right sided lower limb pain after review by an orthopaedic surgeon.
Surgical decompression was not offered as it was felt too risky.
At chronic pain clinic, a L3 selective nerve root injection and lumbar facet joint injections were proposed.
Methods A case study was written, using case notes of the patient as the source of information.
During an attempted right sided Fill wow more bag slots the nerve root injection the initial needle position was recognised to be intradiscal at L2-3 level.
The needle was repositioned and a L3 nerve root injection was performed uneventfully.
Intravenous antibiotics were administered immediately post procedure.
The patient was readmitted two weeks later with worsening low back pain and CRP of 103.
Sensation and bladder and bowel function were intact.
Urgent MRI showed vertebral osteomyelitis at L2 and L3, and intervertebral disc desiccation.
Follow up MRI scans confirmed the diagnosis of discitis.
Blood cultures revealed a coagulase negative staphylococcus.
She was started on IV flucloxacillin for six weeks, and IV rifampicin, and then changed to oral antibiotics.
Her hospital stay was complicated by Hickman line infection, and pain management challenges.
She was finally discharged home seven months later.
Conclusion Infection including meningitis, osteomyelitis, epidural abscess and discitis is a serious but rare complication of spinal injections.
Goodman et al, in a comprehensive literature review of lumbar, interlaminar and transforaminal epidural injections, reported the incidence of serious infections to be 0.
We discuss the management of a patient who developed discitis following an inadvertent intradiscal needle entry.
The onset of symptoms follows trauma in 50% of cases, however other possible aetiologies include coccygeal nerve entrapment, coccygeal intervertebral disc pathology and abnormal coccygeal mobility.
Recognised treatments for coccydynia include NSAIDs, physical therapy, pericoccygeal infiltration with local anaesthetic and steroids and ganglion of impar block.
In patients with chronic coccydynia these treatments may not result in prolonged pain relief.
Methods We present the case of a 47-year-old man who experienced the sudden onset of pain in the coccygeal region on bending.
The pain had a significant impact on his quality of life as he was unable to sit for any duration, to pursue training to be a HGV driver and as a result he became unemployed.
On clinical examination no pain was elicited on stressing the see more joints, but there was marked tenderness of the coccygeal region on palpation.
MRI imaging revealed pronounced anterior angulation of the coccyx.
Results Initial treatment of pericoccygeal infiltration of local anaesthetic and steroid provided 80% pain relief for a period of 1 week.
Due to the short lived pain relief and failure of other conservative treatments we proceeded to radiofrequency denervation of coccygeal nerves at the sacral hiatus.
The procedure was conducted in day surgery under local anaesthesia without any adverse events.
A 22G radiofrequency needle with a 5mm active tip was placed at the entrance of the sacral hiatus and three lesions at 80 °C for 90 seconds made.
This treatment resulted in a reduction pain intensity of 80% for a period of 6 months without any adverse effects.
Conclusion Radiofrequency denervation of the coccygeal nerves should be considered as a treatment for coccyx pain following a diagnostic block.
Category: Interventional Pain Management John Lankester, Louise Jeynes West Suffolk Hospital, Suffolk, UK Background Emergency Department ED management of patients with chronic pain is poorly studied, yet their attendance at EDs is common, and often frustrating for staff and patients alike.
At the West Suffolk Hospital patients with long term opiate use for chronic pain are managed in a designated clinic with a specific pathway incorporating opioid screening and monitoring tools, standardised patient information, consent, agreement documentation and goal setting.
This study aims to examine whether chronic opioid use is associated with high levels of ED utilisation and whether routine outpatient management of these patients in a designated opioid clinic reduces attendance at the ED.
Methods Patients under the care of the opioid clinic who attended the ED more than twice a year were retrospectively identified.
All ED attendances, regardless of presenting complaint, were identified for these patients over a four year period between October 2009 and October 2013.
Monthly rates of ED attendance before and after commencement of opioid clinic attendance were then calculated.
The mean length of time spent in the ED was also analysed with regard to the four hour wait target currently in place in UK emergency departments.
Results Of 56 patients who have attended the chronic opioid use clinic, 17 attended the ED more than twice per year 30%whilst only 0.
This cohort had a total of 340 ED attendances over the 4 year data set.
The mean length of time spent in the ED was 188 minutes with 21 visits lasting four hours or more 6.
Mean ED attendance was 0.
Conclusion Patients with long term opioid use were more likely to frequently attend the ED.
The rate of ED attendance was reduced following attendance at the designated opioid clinic, suggesting that structured, standardised and monitored opioid prescription may reduce the need for unscheduled care.
A new applicant came into this part-time post in February 2011 JC providing an opportunity to be more rigorous in data collection for outcomes and patient satisfaction.
This presentation focuses on the development and Results of a new satisfaction questionnaire for patients who have been discharged from individual work with JC.
It explores satisfaction in the context of the aims of twin slot shelving system bq job role: confidence and motivation, and the provision of appropriate information, to develop or continue with regular exercise in the home or community setting.
Care was taken to address issues pertaining readability, avoiding ambiguity and relevance and included a 0-5 scale.
Anonymised demographic information was collected.
Patients and staff were asked to trial the questionnaire and amendments made.
Between December 2011 and November 2013, JC distributed satisfaction questionnaires at discharge.
These were returned by post or to reception.
JC entered anonymised data onto an Excel spreadsheet which has been analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
Results 232 patients were discharged with 105 questionnaires being distributed.
Reasons for non-distribution for the 127 questionnaires included: not opting-in for treatment; failing to attend; referred back to referrer for clinical reasons.
The least endorsed was help with weight management 58.
Themes were developed for the questions: what was most useful 106 comments; 5 themes ; least useful 5 individual comments ; what would you improve 5 individual comments ; further comments 38 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative comment.
The poster presents these Results in more detail.
Conclusion This audit indicates that a fitness instructor, integrated within a pain management service, can have an important role for providing education and knowledge, enhancing confidence, reassurance, and motivation to exercise themes from comments section.
Of particular note was the improvement in the percentage of patients undertaking regular exercise eg going for a brisk walk, cycling, doing a circuit of exercises swimming - at least twice a week.
Suggestions for service improvements related to logistical issues.
It is acknowledged that feedback was not received from all patients, and data entry was undertaken by the clinician seeking feedback.
Peri-operative pain and surgical site blood loss constitute the major physiological stresses facing these patients.
Fear of pain is a major concern to these individuals and their relatives.
The best form of analgesia is surgical repair but this is rarely an immediate option, necessitating a period when appropriate pain relief must be provided.
Prompt and adequate relief of pain has long been identified as a major priority in the management of hip fracture.
This must be considered carefully as the characteristics freeslotgamesjumpingjalopenas this patient group mean they are at high risk of renal dysfunction from NSAIDs and also opioid toxicity.
Using nerve blockade on presentation and at the time of surgery is now recommended to minimise the use of opioids.
Methods We carried out a retrospective audit of 50 consecutive patients presenting with fractured neck of femur to York hospital.
Our aims were to compare our current local practise in peri-operative analgesia in this patient group with guidelines produced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and the Association of Anaesthetists in Great Britain and Ireland in 2011.
The provision of simple regular analgesia was in keeping with guidelines; 100% were prescribed regular paracetamol pre and post operatively and 91% were prescribed codeine.
No patients were prescribed NSAIDs.
Nerve blocks were underused; no patients received a pre-operative nerve block in Accident and Emergency and only 56% received a nerve block at the time of surgery.
They will aim to improve initial assessment of pain and ensure adequate analgesia is provided, especially in patients with cognitive dysfunction.
The National Pain Audit found that 20% of people attending pain services i.
Still more may never attend an outpatient pain service at all.
The profile and needs of this population remain poorly understood.
The National Pain Audit has called for an inpatient audit in its future workplan.
Methods All inpatient referrals to the pain management service that did not require immediate attention were made on an electronic system as part of a No Delays internal hospital project.
These were triaged by a co-ordinator for the day to a pain review associated with trauma or peri-operative care that could be physician or nurse lead, to a non complex persistent pain review and to a complex pain review where a specialist pain consultant reviewed the case.
All immediate referrals were made to a bleep and were not included in the data.
Source of the referral and outcome were noted.
A standard of 24 hours to be seen was set as part of the No Delays project.
Results 191 referrals were made in 10 weeks - this amounted to 161 referrals.
Due to lack of capacity very few of these complex patients could be seen within the time frame of 24 hours.
A significant proportion had unrecognised mental health pathology and required in hospital psychiatric assessment.
Case conferences were needed on average once a fortnight.
Conclusion The number of referrals was surprising.
An electronic system allowed accurate logging and identified the need.
It was not possible to see these patients within a timely fashion meaning delays in discharge in an already over stretched hospital system may occur.
These patients comprise a significant workload.
Mental health needs go unrecognised and undiagnosed meaning patients that may be highly vulnerable may miss out on help.
A National Inpatient Pain Audit seems a highly appropriate way forwards.
Category: Management Audit Leigh-James Spurling, Karin Cannons, Anne Fish, Mohjir Baloch Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley, Surrey, UK Background Patients seen in our Outpatient Pain Clinic are routinely sent a copy of the post-clinic letter.
This details clinic discussion, treatment and any follow-up arrangements.
It is a Department of Health recommendation that patients receive such letters.
Additionally, patients attending pain clinics rate the explanation of their problem to be as important as its treatment.
With this in mind, we sought to establish timeliness of patient receipt of their letters and how helpful it was to them.
Patients should receive correspondence within four weeks and we aimed to establish how to improve our communication with patients through this medium.
Methods A sample of 100 patients was selected from pain clinic attendees over a two month period May-June 2013.
New and follow-up patients from all clinicians were selected.
A questionnaire pro forma with cover letter and stamped addressed envelope was sent to each patient identified.
Focussing on timeliness, we asked how long it took for patients to receive their letters.
These included clarity, accuracy, usefulness as a reminder of clinic discussions and for understanding management of the condition.
We also asked whether patients felt more involved in their treatment.
Included in the questionnaire was a free text section for general comments.
Results 42 42% of the 100 patients surveyed responded.
Of these, 38 90% received a copy of their letter, the majority 28, 76% within 4 weeks.
Of those patients who go here receiving a letter 38 individuals34 89% felt more involvement in their treatment as a result.
It helped 17 of 26 65% better manage their drug treatment, 18 of 25 72% understand their injection treatment, 6 of 12 50% understand their physiotherapy and 10 of 16 63% understand psychological interventions.
The majority of patients 36, 93% thought the letters were clear and easily to understand, while 35 89% agreed that it was a useful reminder of the clinic discussion.
Conclusion A clinic letter sent to the patient is an effective means of involving a patient in their treatment.
However, a better understanding of their various treatments, rationale, efficacy and practical aspects could be achieved through a structured style.
Additional administrative support for the clinic has been secured to improve time to dispatch of letters.
We have implemented a hand written summary sheet for urgent communications, such as medication changes, that is handwritten and sent with the patient to pass to their GP.
British Pain Society has published clear guidelines for prescribing opioids in this group of patients.
The guidelines state that all patients with opioids prescription should be reviewed at least bi-annually.
The regular reviews are also important to assess the need to continue opioids.
We undertook an audit to review our opioid prescription practice and compliance with guideline.
Methods All patients attending our multidisciplinary pain clinic during the month of November 2013 were included in the audit.
A standard questionnaire was used to collect the data.
It included questions to find out the type of opioid, duration of use, person prescribing, frequency of reviews and effectiveness of opioid in controlling pain.
Results Audit data was collected from 152 patients in one month.
Out of this, 37% 57 patients were on strong opioids.
Of the 57 patients, 38% were on morphine compared to 47% who were on tramadol.
Audit also showed that more than half 52% of opioid prescriptions were started in primary care.
Of the 57 patients who were on opioids, 3 were having repeat prescriptions without any reviews.
But majority had their reviews at least every 6 months 52% or 30 patients.
Some of the patients 18 were not sure whether they had any reviews or not.
Conclusion Our audit clearly shows that significant number of patients having opioids prescribed were not having regular reviews.
Several patients lacked awareness regarding their reviews and thereby its importance.
We really have to question whether it is appropriate to continue opioids for patients who do not find benefit from them.
We plan to educate both patients and health professionals regarding the importance of regular reviews.
The Results of this Audit would be used to make amendments to the opioid prescription practice in primary care and Pain clinics so that we would avoid any inappropriate opioid prescriptions and follow BPS guidelines.
In 2010 the British Pain Society published revised guidance on prescribing of opioids in persistent pain.
These recommendations and guidelines provided a useful framework to establish and incorporate locally agreed standards for clinical practice within a pathway for chronic opioid therapy COT.
Key components of the pathway include the use of opioid screening and monitoring tools, standardised patient information, both written consent and agreement documentation alongside goal setting.
The pathway is led by pain clinicians and co-ordinated by clinical nurse specialists.
The aim of this retrospective audit was to review electronic records of patients who have attended the opioid clinic at the West Suffolk Hospital WSH to i review standards for documented clinical practice and ii to identify any aspect of care that could be improved upon.
Results 70 electronic records of patients who had attended the opioid clinic at the WSH were royale slot vegas />For all the above indicators the required locally agreed standard was 100%.
Results demonstrated mainly excellent compliance for audit indictors with all Results varying between 96-100%.
Conclusion Early Results demonstrate excellent compliance with the locally agreed standards.
These findings suggest that an agreed opioid pathway influences good clinical practice in relation to opioid prescribing in CNMP.
Following the implementation of a pathway for COT we have observed an improvement in risk assessment and risk stratification, informed consent and agreement as well as improved monitoring.
We feel that a pathway offers an opportunity to reduce risks whilst maximising the benefit of opioid therapy.
It aims to review patients with poor pain control, w and make recommendations on management.
It comprises of acute and check this out subspecialists; the former is dedicated to managing post-operative and medical patients for see more sickle cell crisis.
Whereas the latter deals with patients with complex biopsychosocial health and analgesic needs.
The service is available for children and adults.
The goal of the pain team is to improve patient care by providing individualised and specialized pain sim in hindi dedicated slot meaning Methods, improve pain control and allow for timely discharge.
Audits have been carried out for pain team for single interventions, however most patients are seen on several occasions, and their complete management from referral to discharge has never been audited.
Methods We carried out a retrospective database analysis of all in-patients seen by the pain team over an 8 month period, from April to November 2013.
Pain follow-up documentation used for review and treatment of patients, were analyzed.
Demographic, reasons for admission, baseline analgesia and pain team interventions were recorded, as well as total number of visits and time spent.
Numerical rating scales NRS for that pci express 3 in 2 slot thought assessment were used as outcome measures.
Data was analyzed with descriptive Methods, correlations and regression analysis to determine which pain team variables influenced the outcomes.
Data was analyzed in IBM SPSS 22.
Mean age was 53.
Of these, 44% had more than 50% resolution in NRS.
Descriptive data analysis showed there was a greater number of total pain team interventions within those patients with more than 50% pain resolution in the paediatric group.
Whereas adults were likely to benefit from the introduction of new medications.
The correlations in both groups were not statistically significant.
Conclusion The reduction in pain scores suggests the pain team has a positive impact on in-patient pain management.
However, there are too many variables affecting pain scores, which we were unable to control.
For example, one would expect time itself to improve pain scores in an acute situation.
Furthermore, the large amount of missing data may be poorly representative of the sample.
Future audits should aim for clearer and more complete data collection with fewer numbers of variables.
As well as including patient perspectives and cost-benefit analyses.
The goal of this strategy is to address different pain pathways with different medications to improve quality of analgesia and to reduce opioid consumption 1.
The latter is especially important as opioid-related adverse effects are often bothersome drowsiness, itchiness, constipation, nausea and vomiting and sometimes even life threatening respiratory depression.
The so far most widely used multi-modal regimen is prescribing according to the World Health Organization WHO analgesic ladder, which initially included three steps 2.
Recently a fourth step has been introduced including adjuncts like ketamine or gabapentin 3.
However, to what degree this modified WHO ladder is employed is completely elusive at present.
Hence an audit was conducted to evaluate analgesic prescribing according to the modified analgesic ladder.
Methods Between March and April 2012 a multi-centre survey involving six London and Oxford teaching Hospitals was conducted.
Patients were exposed to short questionnaire-based interviews, asking about their current pain intensity and co-morbidities.
Drug charts were reviewed to obtain information about opioid consumption and co-analgesic prescribing and administration.
Descriptive statistics were employed for data analysis.
Data were presented as n % for the entire cohort, for medical and for surgical patients, respectively.
Results 902 patients 507 medical and 395 surgical were included in the analysis.
Common analgesic regimens coincide with WHO analgesic ladder use, increasing in steps as pain increases.
Paracetamol was most commonly used in the WHO1 analgesic group, with tramadol being the most frequent WHO2 analgesic and short acting morphine the most common strong analgesic WHO3.
Conclusion Across London and Oxford hospitals, analgesic prescribing often followed the WHO analgesic ladder.
However, pain management still heavily relies on opioid based analgesics with adjuncts at present only playing a side role.
Further studies needed to determine the efficacy of these, and other, analgesic combinations.
An audit on patient compliance with prescribed analgesics from pain clinic Category: Management Audit James Wilson, Adam Woo Kings College Hospital, London, UK Background In Pain Clinics, we prescribe many medications for analgesia and assume these will be continued.
These all have potential side effects and financial implications.
Patient compliance is often poor, leading to drug discontinuation.
Frequently patients in follow up or drug titration clinics are unaware of the drugs and doses they are taking leading to wasted appointments.
General Practitioners may also stop expensive anti-neuropathic medications and switch them to cheaper alternatives.
In the current financial situation we need to avoid wasted appointments so we set out to design an audit to look at how common this advantages of slotted aloha actually is and how we could improve patient compliance and improve the efficient use of resources.
Methods A prospective audit was performed on 100 follow-up patients in Kings College Hospital Pain Clinic.
They were all asked the same standardised questions to see if they were compliant with the medication regime prescribed by the Pain clinic, if they were non-compliant or if it was impossible to assess compliance as they did not know what they were taking.
If they were non-compliant, we looked at whether they were taking a different dose to that prescribed or not taking the medication at all.
We then looked football slot receivers the causes of non-compliance; whether that was because of side effects, lack of efficacy, GP not happy to continue the medication, language and communication difficulties or not known.
Results We analysed data on 100 outpatients.
Of these; 53% were taking the medication at the dosage prescribed by the pain clinic.
Of the patients who were not taking the medication prescribed; 54% were taking the same medication at a different dose and 46% were no longer taking the prescribe medication at all.
Reasons for non-compliance were; side effects 46%, lack of efficacy 26%, GP not re-prescribing 31%, language barriers 3% and unknown 23%.
Conclusion We found that 12% of our pain outpatients did not know what medication they were taking at all, representing a significant waste of clinic time.
A significant percentage of patients non compliant with prescribed medication were due to lack of efficacy or side-effects but nearly a third were due to GPs discontinuing medication prescribed in clinic.
In order to enhance efficient use of Pain Clinics, efforts must be made to ensure that patients bring accurate records of any drugs taken to clinic and further collaboration with GPs is essential to determine what drugs will actually be continued in Primary Care.
The aetiology is controversial but the resultant inflammation of the flexor tendons compresses the median nerve and produces these symptoms.
Carpal tunnel release surgery CTRS aims to relieve the compression by dividing the transverse carpal ligament, thereby providing more space for the median nerve inside the carpal tunnel.
CTRS outcomes, however, remain controversial largely due to varied outcome measures used.
In contrast, therapeutic massage aims to relieve nerve compression by draining paratendinous fluid and dislodging adhesions on adjacent tissues to reduce inflammation.
Such massage must be performed daily and for several weeks.
The outcomes of different CTRS reports have never been standardized, nor have any been compared with therapeutic massage.
Methods This study compared the outcomes from CTRS including open release, single- and double-portal endoscopic and the technique of therapeutic massage.
CTRS outcomes were retrospectively assessed from 11 published reports between progressive slots pro and 2013 and included 430 patients.
Therapeutic massage data were obtained in a single-blind prospective investigation of 36 patients visit web page received daily mechanized therapeutic massage of the forearm for 90 days.
For the prospective clinical investigation, the Carpal Rx was used red hot respin slots decreasing frequency daily to weekly from baseline to 90 days.
Patients provided MHQ data at baseline, 30, 60 and 90 days.
Results among CTRS studies were compared using parametric statistical analyses.
Various statistical analyses assessed the outcome of the Carpal Rx Results, which was compared with CTRS data.
By year 2 pain resolution was 68.
In general, open release surgery scored slightly lower on most metrics, while endoscopic surgery scored higher.
The prospective clinical investigation of mechanized massage showed that at 30 days, 92.
At 60 and 90 days, pain resolution was 95.
Patient compliance determined with a patient diary using the Carpal Rx was 98%, 86% and 59% at 30, 60 and 90 days, respectively.
In contrast, massage therapy using the Carpal Rx scores markedly higher in pain resolution and patient satisfaction.
Symptom resolution is rapid, and except for severe symptoms, daily therapy is not required beyond 30 days.
Considering the Carpal Rx is non-invasive, inexpensive, and highly efficacious, it should be the first therapeutic choice for treating carpal tunnel syndrome.
Methods This was a prospective, observational study including patients prescribed either 7-day TDB, co-codamol tablets or tramadol tablets for a minimum of 1 month.
OA and associated healthcare costs, including GP consultations, were also collected.
The Results from interim analyses are reported.
Results 755 patients completed the baseline questionnaire and 636 patients 27.
Patient satisfaction with treatment was higher for 7-day TDB patches with 80.
Mean SD GP costs were £14.
The improvements in QoL and satisfaction bni education slot quiz possibly be a result of improved adherence with the transdermal patch, although the reverse is also possible, with improved QoL and satisfaction leading to improved self reported adherence.
Costs associated with GP contacts were also lower for patients receiving 7-day TDB; however, there were fewer patients in this treatment group.
There is concern about the implications of this trend, but most interest has focused on issues of drug diversion, dependency, overdoses and fatalities.
In contrast, the human suffering of opioid-induced adverse effects has gained little attention.
One of the commonest side-effects of opioids is constipation, and unlike other side-effects, tolerance does not develop over time.
A small number of patients require hospitalisation for faecal impaction.
Therefore the individual and societal burden of OIC is considerable, but hitherto has never been quantified in a standardised way.
Comparisons of the prevalence and impact of OIC and its management have never been attempted across countries.
Methods We describe an international, multicentre, prospective, observational, non-interventional cohort study of patients with OIC whilst using prescription opioids for chronic, non-cancer pain.
Entry was defined by presence of constipation starting or worsening since opioids were prescribed; AND use of laxatives if 3 or more bowel movements BMs in past 2 weeks OR less than 3 BMs in past 2 weeks regardless of laxative use; OR not using laxatives but reporting at least one symptom of OIC on the PAC-SYM questionnaire scored moderate, severe or very severe.
Recruited patients from 4 countries United States, Canada, Germany, and United Kingdom gave consent to the study, which involved monthly internet-based assessments for 6 months to catalogue their experience of OIC, use of laxatives prescribed and bought over the counter OTCand impact on daily living.
We present here Results of the baseline evaluations.
Results 500 patients completed baseline survey; 493 99% met OIC criteria.
Overall, mean age was 52.
Back and joint pain most commonly reported 77% and 52% respectively.
Average pain severity 0-10 scale in past 7 days was 6.
Conclusion OIC is associated with significant burden of system slots that compromise activities of daily living.
The majority of patients were not satisfied with their OIC treatment and only a third felt they benefited from laxative treatment.
Physicians have a poor knowledge of how much constipation their patients are experiencing and had little insight into their medication.
More research is needed to better understand treatment goals with chronic pain and OIC and to identify more efficacious treatments.
Exploring the information needs of people with complex regional pain syndrome Category: Neuropathic Pain Sharon Grieve 1,2, Jo Adams 2, Candida McCabe 1,3 1Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK, 2University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 3University of the West of England, Bristol, UK Background United Kingdom guidelines indicate individuals with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome CRPS require information and education to support self management Goebel et al.
However, there is little evidence regarding the specific information needs of this patient group.
Research indicates individuals with CRPS recognise the importance of being informed; to increase knowledge, normalise their experience and learn new coping strategies Rodham et al.
However when investigated, patients actual knowledge of the condition may be limited potentially undermining their ability to successfully self manage CRPS Brunner et al.
check this out opportunity for individuals with CRPS to access information from health professionals or other sources is crucial to facilitate diagnosis and to initiate and engage with therapies early in the onset of the condition.
This qualitative study explored the specific information requirements of patients with CRPS and provides insight into how health professionals can best provide this.
Methods Following ethical approval, study information was placed on three websites for those with an interest in CRPS.
Eight adults living with CRPS in the United Kingdom were recruited and semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted following informed consent.
They were asked about their experience of receiving information since diagnosis and what information they would choose to receive and in what form.
The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis Braun and Clarke 2006.
A summary of the interview was returned to each participant for respondent validation adding credibility to the data.
To offset researcher bias, source random sample of the data was coded independently by a peer researcher.
The findings were then taken back to the participants using a questionnaire, asking what information they perceived to be the most important to receive and in what form.
Results Five themes emerged from the data.
Conclusion Participants described receiving little information from many health professionals at diagnosis and beyond.
The internet was the most frequently used resource and information was found to be inconsistent and difficult to access.
Consequently there was a struggle for participants to understand the condition, access expertise and appropriate treatment.
Participants identified a need for accurate, truthful information from initial diagnosis to address questions such as risk of spread, fear of making the condition worse and how to live with CRPS.
They preferred to access this from health professionals directly.
Easily accessible patient resources to facilitate early referral for expertise are required.
Advanced disease and extensive co-morbidities limit surgical revascularisation options in this patient group.
Often the only treatment option is symptomatic relief.
Effective analgesia can be difficult to achieve, limited by side effects e.
A drug which is here renally excreted, has minimal systemic absorption and does not require dose adjustment in renal failure, is an attractive alternative.
Qutenza® topical capsaicin 8% is a dermal application system for the rapid delivery of capsaicin into the skin.


BNI Education Slot


458 459 460 461 462

So, this is a shout out to all BNI Education Coordinators as well.. was to try and help other education coordinators with their four minute slots as there seemed very little in. Now answer YES or NO to the following questions.


COMMENTS:


21.05.2020 in 01:23 Kaganos:

It agree, it is the remarkable information



17.05.2020 in 20:50 Didal:

I think, that you commit an error. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.



19.05.2020 in 15:46 Gubar:

I think, that you are not right. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.



18.05.2020 in 13:15 Zoloshura:

I apologise, but it does not approach me. Perhaps there are still variants?



22.05.2020 in 08:22 Gromi:

Now all is clear, many thanks for the help in this question. How to me you to thank?



23.05.2020 in 10:34 Gabei:

Bravo, excellent idea



18.05.2020 in 20:43 Moogukasa:

Good topic



23.05.2020 in 04:47 Bara:

You commit an error. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM.



24.05.2020 in 11:57 Shakam:

I apologise, but it does not approach me.



24.05.2020 in 21:29 Vuzilkree:

In it something is. Earlier I thought differently, thanks for the help in this question.



16.05.2020 in 21:22 Shagor:

I think, that you are not right. I am assured. Write to me in PM, we will talk.



18.05.2020 in 02:51 Mikataxe:

What words... super, a remarkable phrase



23.05.2020 in 16:06 Shazuru:

I am am excited too with this question. Tell to me, please - where I can find more information on this question?



22.05.2020 in 18:28 Tausar:

I apologise, I can help nothing, but it is assured, that to you will help to find the correct decision.



18.05.2020 in 16:10 Shagami:

In my opinion you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it.



17.05.2020 in 08:14 Dizragore:

Excuse, it is cleared



22.05.2020 in 03:07 Tushicage:

It is interesting. You will not prompt to me, where I can read about it?



18.05.2020 in 11:00 Nelkree:

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are mistaken. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM.



23.05.2020 in 09:13 Aralar:

Dismiss me from it.



24.05.2020 in 21:45 Kejora:

Where I can find it?



21.05.2020 in 11:11 Zulkilrajas:

It agree, very amusing opinion




Total 21 comments.